Patrick Christys Tonight : GBN : April 18, 2024 3:00am-5:01am BST : Free Borrow & Streaming : Internet Archive (2024)

nationals it comes as vietnamese nationals overtake others as the predominant nationality on small boat crossings on the english channel boat crossings on the english channel, vietnamese nationals make up 5% of small boat arrivals last year. that's up from 1% in 2022, according to home office figures . in other home office figures. in other news today, the boss of the post office has been exonerated following an independent investigation into allegations of bullying. nick read always rejected claims of misconduct, the firm says he has its full backing now to lead the organisation, which continues to fall under the spotlight over the horizon. it scandal, during which hundreds of subpostmasters were wrongly convicted of theft and fraud . now, as you've been and fraud. now, as you've been hearing, smacking children should be made illegal in england and northern ireland, according to children's doctors. the royal college of paediatrics and child health says the current law has created grey areas which mean there's sometimes a defence to physical

punishment . sometimes a defence to physical punishment. their report warns children suffer lasting mental and physical effects from being hit in the home, striking a child is already illegal in scotland and wales and in many other countries around the world. and just lastly, prince harry says the travel industry needs to do much more to help local communities. speaking at an event for his eco travel group travalyst, the prince said local cultures must be protected to ensure the tourism industry can thrive. i urge you to focus on what more can be done to ensure the travel and tourism industry continues to have a license to operate , not one entity. >> entity can own sustainability vie we need to work together to change the course and focus on how travel and tourism can bring prosperity to the whole entire system . system. >> for the latest stories, do sign up to gb news alerts. scan the qr code on your screen or go to gb news. com slash alerts .

to gb news. com slash alerts. >> okay, heck of a lot to get through tonight. we are going to start with this. and as you have just heard, the house of lords have refused to bow down to ministerial pressure and back the bill. current the rwanda bill. in its current form, peers insisted by 245 votes to 208, a majority of 37, on a requirement that the east african country cannot be treated as safe until further protections are in place. this means the bill will now return to the commons on monday. look james cleverly hit back big time, the home secretary said. this terrifies died that the rwanda scheme will work. desperate to delay or disrupt either 100 votes about stopping the boats , labour have acted the boats, labour have acted again to block the passage of the rwanda bill. has the house of lords now just signed its own political death warrant? i'm joined by gb news political editor christopher hope. live from westminster. are labour really blame for this ? really to blame for this? >> labour certainly are to blame for this, patrick. they've whipped their peers to oppose

and but the attempt by the commons to reverse those four amendments, two of them will go back on monday. they are from lord brown and lord hope. one is about ensuring that any afghans who serve with uk forces can't be sent to rwanda . and the be sent to rwanda. and the second, from lord hope, is to require repeated checks to show that rwanda is a safe country. these are attempts , according to these are attempts, according to senior government sources, to delay this. this bill becoming law, this safety of rwanda bill. don't forget the pm, rishi sunak wants these planes to take off with migrants on them. by the end of the spring. that by my calendar is june the 21st. this goes back to the lords on monday, guess what? the monday, when, guess what? the same happen again. same thing will happen again. that will the fourth that will be the fourth iteration the so—called ping iteration of the so—called ping pong. i've been told by a senior government sources tonight here pong. i've been told by a senior gothe|ment sources tonight here pong. i've been told by a senior gothe house;ources tonight here pong. i've been told by a senior gothe house of rces tonight here pong. i've been told by a senior gothe house of commonsrt here pong. i've been told by a senior gothe house of commons and re in the house of commons and house lords, they might house of lords, that they might go as six times back and go as many as six times back and forth, the time forth, that the delay the time is side. the more is on labour's side. the more they can delay this, the less likely flights take likely that these flights take off in number before the election. is to

election. labour's plan is to aboush election. labour's plan is to abolish it. scrap the plan. even if it's working well, it can't work if the rwanda bill won't become law. labour, the government side, that there's no suggestion of any kind of beanng suggestion of any kind of bearing to this pressure from from the peers in labour. they're going to carry on and try and make sure they can get this through intact. the bill works. the government says labour that . labour disputes that. >> i mean, this is i think >> yeah. i mean, this is i think many would argue , just many people would argue, just unprecedented. incredibly, unprecedented. and incredibly, incredibly political. christopher isn't he? i mean, what could the upshot of all of this be? >> it's not unprecedented. it's happened before this ping pong. this normally like when he makes sausages at home. patrick, you don't see how it's done, but they taste pretty nice when you're under the grill. normally, this legislation appears, no one really pays appears, and no one really pays attention to how it has gone through house commons and through the house of commons and the lords. what's the house of lords. what's happening are happening here is peers are upset, about this. upset, concerned about this. they mentioned in they don't see it mentioned in the manifesto because it the in the manifesto because it wasn't in 2019. therefore, they

feel to try and feel emboldened to try and change it. so it may soften it. in a sense, the government's point of view though , patrick, point of view though, patrick, is it makes it opens up more loopholes for lawyers to exploit measures here, reasons why certain people can't be sent to rwanda and make it harder to get the flights taking off. that's the flights taking off. that's the battle in place here. we've seen back in the seen it before. back in the mid—noughties, when their peers opposed casinos which opposed the super casinos which labour tried to build around the country. concerns about gambling and addictions then. so sometimes that's what the house of lords does. but it's really frustrating for the government, for the house of commons, they feel. can't the lords bow to feel. why can't the lords bow to our will? >> w- >> christopher, thank you very, very that's christopher very much. that's christopher hope editor hope there, our political editor in there in westminster for us. so there we do have it. the labour party has whipped its laws to block that rwanda bill again and apparently could well now open even more legal loopholes for the lawyers to exploit. well, look, moving on now. so why on earth was a muslim pupil spurred

on by a violent mob of religious fanatics, given £150,000 in legal aid, the pupil wanted to make an entire school change its rules so she could do an islamic prayer. and we paid her legal aid bill of somewhere in the region of 150 grand. when she leaves school and gets a job, she should be made to pay that back. and her mother, who went along with this, start along with this, should start paying along with this, should start paying it back now too. paying some of it back now too. you vulnerable can't you know, vulnerable women can't get to try to get civil legal aid to try to get civil legal aid to try to get violent partner removed get a violent partner removed from home. many cases, from their home. in many cases, the women's budget did a the women's budget group did a survey. respondents said survey. 85% of respondents said vulnerable women were unable to access civil legal aid . but if access civil legal aid. but if you are a muslim schoolgirl who wants to take an outstanding school to the high court and you're supported by a baying load of lunatics who are calling in bomb threats and dishing out racist abuse and putting lives at you get the money. at risk. then you get the money. the number of legal aid cases to help people get the early advice they need dropped from almost 1,000,000 in 2009 to 2010 just

130,000 in 2021. over the same penod 130,000 in 2021. over the same period , the number of people period, the number of people having to go to court without representation trebled , representation trebled, reportedly. but if you are a muslim schoolgirl who voluntarily went to a school knowing what the rules were and then crying about having your religious rights infringed, you can get 150 grand in legal aid until you who else doesn't have any problem accessing legal aid? it is illegal migrants. legal costs total £71 million between 2019 and 2023, averaging around 38 grand a day. a record £18 million was forked out in 2020, with the cost coming in at £13 million last year. if you're wondering why the legal community appears to be so angry about deportations to rwanda, then really, i think you just have to follow the money, don't you? the ministry justice you? the ministry of justice launched consultation launched a consultation about increasing by increasing legal aid rates by 15% for immigration lawyers representing asylum seekers threatened with removal to rwanda. maybe some of the desperate female victims of

domestic abuse should just run off to syria and join isis. because shamima begum was given about 250 grand in legal aid, reportedly again , i can't help reportedly again, i can't help but wonder if there's a theme here. the rochdale pakistani grooming gang have reportedly received around £2 million in legal aid. we legal aid for legal aid. we pay legal aid for all sorts of wrong'uns foreign rapists after five years, 24 court appearances, 20 judges and 85 grand in legal aid, we eventually sent yakub ahmed back to somalia, but only after agreeing that the taxpayer should pay for a 14 week stay in one of somalia's most luxurious hotels. all meals included, plus armed guards and a personalised therapy package. after complaining of mental health issues. seriously, it's the legal aid agency that ultimately decides, apparently, who gets awarded legal aid . but who are awarded legal aid. but who are these people? does anyone think it's a little bit odd that rights across the country, people are struggling to access legal but if you are a legal aid, but if you are a foreign national, an illegal

immigrant in isis bride, or a member of the british muslim community, it seems like you will get what you need. let's go to the thoughts my panel this to the thoughts on my panel this evening. the director to the thoughts on my panel this ev popular the director to the thoughts on my panel this ev popular conservatives, ctor to the thoughts on my panel this ev popular conservatives, mark of popular conservatives, mark littlewood , businessman and littlewood, businessman and activist brookes, author activist adam brookes, an author and journalist, rebecca reid. mark, i'm going to start with you on this. does everyone have a right to legal aid, in your view , everyone does in certain view, everyone does in certain circ*mstances. i think if you are charged with a criminal offence. so the state is saying we think you've committed a crime and we're inclined to take away your freedom, and you don't have the money to get a lawyer. you're entitled to that does you're entitled to it. that does not this scenario. not pertain in this scenario. patrick i mean, how to start even on this story? there should be, in my view, no course of legal action here at all. even if this girl had put forward 150 grand of her own money or her parents had, i don't believe you should be able to litigate a successful school on a headmaster imposing their own prayer policy, there prayer policy, so there shouldn't of legal shouldn't be a course of legal action whatsoever, even it action whatsoever, even if it was privately funded. but if it

is going to be a course of legal action, it should be done entirely from the cost privately. or you could crowd fund it for sake of argument. and a final point on this 150 grand. >> well, 150 grand. wasn't her costs because she lost. she also had to pay so and bubble sang had to pay so and bubble sang had a very expensive lawyer. so, so that's not an accurate figure. >> you should be able to surely adjudicate a decision like this. as i say, i don't think it should be actionable. but then bubble sang's lawyers have had to be capped, rebecca, we to be capped, too. rebecca, we should to adjudicate and should be able to adjudicate and decide if you decide on these things if you think actionable. think they're actionable. i don't think should be for don't think they should be for a few but they few thousand, but they did. >> capped. >> it's capped. it was capped. they did 150 grand. but but the issue with how would that work in practice if you say legal aid is capped to x, the person is capped to x, if the person you suing very you are suing has a very expensive you expensive lawyer, how do you then facilitate capping? expensive lawyer, how do you the what.itate capping? expensive lawyer, how do you the what do te capping? expensive lawyer, how do you the what do yoquping? expensive lawyer, how do you the what do you want|? >> what do you want that individual do? her career individual to do? if her career and reputation is on the line and reputation is on the line and it has been brilliant, her career reputation just loved it. >> if she'd lost it once, lost, well, she would still have

well, no, she would still have loved seen the loved it. have you seen the things but going things she says? but going back to specifics of legal aid, to the specifics of legal aid, she said she said she sat down with and she said that there with me and she said that there have been bomb threats. teachers have been bomb threats. teachers have racially none have been racially abused, none of which there was any evidence for. okay, but for. but okay, well, she but specifically outrageous specifically what? >> outrageous you're >> that's outrageous that you're saying no bomb saying that there was no bomb threats. police were called threats. the police were called to and school was to the school and the school was shut one point. there is shut down at one point. there is evidence that. evidence for that. >> well, specifically to evidence for that. >> leak well, specifically to evidence for that. >> leak specifically fically to evidence for that. >> leak specifically ficithe to evidence for that. >> le aid specifically ficithe to evidence for that. >> le aid question,yficithe to evidence for that. >> leaid question, you'rea to legal aid question, you're automatically to legal legal aid question, you're autiiffatically to legal legal aid question, you're autiif you ally to legal legal aid question, you're autiif you are to legal legal aid question, you're autiif you are betweento legal legal aid question, you're autiif you are between if legal legal aid question, you're autiif you are between if you're aid if you are between if you're 16 or 18. so 16 in full time education, 18 not so. this is not an and then beyond that the legal aid agency looked this legal aid agency looked at this case said this was case and they said this was useful law. whether you useful case law. so whether you agree or not this means agree with it or not this means that changed law that it has changed case law going forward. >> okay, a taxpayer >> okay, adam, a taxpayer is being with cases like this. >> of course they are. >> of course they are. >> i mean, you can't we can't be expected to fund, where expected to fund, cases where people just don't like the law or they're against the policy. >> said earlier, this >> as you said earlier, this kid and parents what the and the parents knew what the rules of the school were when they installed her in that

school. and i'd like to go back to katharine birbalsingh because i believe she's a fantastic headteacher. think the results headteacher. i think the results are some of the best in the country. >> she they're not they're consistent with lots of good things. >> she stands up country, she stands up for discipline and against woke culture and i think if there was more, headteachers like her in this country, this country would have a better chance going forward , she also chance going forward, she also once said that working class children needed harder discipline than middle class children. she said some really objectionable things, but non—specifically to that on non—specifically to that hang on the wall. >> can i just say on that we now have a criminal justice system thatis have a criminal justice system that is potentially going to give lenient sentences. give out more lenient sentences. if a harder if people have had a harder start so that start in life? so that is actually a universally recognised thing, isn't it? those different things. those are two different things. it's about that. it's outrageous about that. >> saying you to >> no, she's saying you have to be harder working be harder on working class children. you're children. and what you're suggesting say suggesting is the courts say you have because more have to be softer because more discipline. no, that's working class children need more class. children don't need more discipline. really discipline. that's a really egregious to suggest. egregious thing to suggest. >> all heads or principals >> need all heads or principals to uniform, right ? if

to be utterly uniform, right? if katharine birbalsingh is not to your don't send kids your taste, don't send your kids to her school. >> but when that started her school. >> but when? by her rule. >> but when? by her rule. >> but when that kid started missing, they were allowed to missing, they were allowed to miss a major here. miss a major point here. >> it's matter of law. >> it's not a matter of law. >> it's not a matter of law. >> were allowed. >> they were allowed. >> they were allowed. >> it doesn't matter if you're christian, if you're muslim, if you're you're if you're sikh, if you're hindu, if the are that you cannot the rules are that you cannot pray, praying pray, especially mass praying like then like some of them have, then that the rules, i don't care. that is the rules, i don't care. no religion should have any priority . i no religion should have any priority. i agree, no religion should have any priority . i agree, and no religion should have any priority. i agree, and i'm i'm firm on that. >> i agree with you. but when that child started at that school, rule was that they school, the rule was that they were pray and the were allowed to pray and the rule changed. so when were allowed to pray and the rule say, changed. so when were allowed to pray and the rule say, oh, changed. so when were allowed to pray and the rule say, oh, don'tanged. so when were allowed to pray and the rule say, oh, don't send. so when were allowed to pray and the rule say, oh, don't send yourwhen you say, oh, don't send your child there, that's not the rule. that wasn't the rule to start fair start with. that's not a fair judgement person because judgement on that person because it disruptive, judgement on that person because it but disruptive, judgement on that person because it but (changed , judgement on that person because it but (changed the what. but they changed the rules. they can't keep saying, oh, your child. oh, don't send your child. i know you've all said don't send your child there. the rule know you've all said don't send your cithat here. the rule know you've all said don't send your cithat wasn't the rule school that wasn't the rule apparently to children apparently up to 30 children were the schoolyard were praying in the schoolyard at one time. >> can imagine? >> i mean, can you imagine? >> i mean, can you imagine? >> to be doing >> we all used to be doing poppers in the schoolyard. >> rather disruptive, >> i'd rather that disruptive, that again, doesn't

that is. again, it doesn't matter religion is. matter what religion it is. >> was at changed >> the school i was at changed their rules quite a lot while i was there. i didn't sue them. >> right. okay. now, the >> all right. okay. now, the people in statement people said in a statement issued by law firm simpson miller. school was very well issued by law firm simpson milland school was very well issued by law firm simpson milland generally was very well issued by law firm simpson milland generally very very well issued by law firm simpson milland generally very very vat l run and generally very good at managing everything, felt managing everything, but i felt that right thing in that i did the right thing in seeking challenge the ban. seeking to challenge the ban. and mother said and her mother said my daughter's impassioned stance compelled and compelled me to support her, and i firm decision. i stand firm in that decision. her in pursuing her courage in pursuing this matter and her courage in pursuing this matconfident and her courage in pursuing this matconfident she's and her courage in pursuing this matconfident she's gained and i'm confident she's gained invaluable the invaluable lessons from the experience. does the experience. yet so does the taxpayer. the tune about taxpayer. to the tune of about £150,000. so thank very £150,000. so thank you very much. still much. right. there's still plenty of time grab your plenty of time to grab your chance win a greek cruise. chance to win a greek cruise. travel goodies £10,000 tax travel goodies and a £10,000 tax free balance boost. free cash bank balance boost. grief is all the details you need. >> don't miss your chance to win our biggest prize so far. there's an incredible £10,000 in tax free cash to spend however you like. plus courtesy of variety cruises, a bespoke seven night small boat cruise for two worth £10,000 with flights, meals , excursions and drinks included. >> your next holiday could be on

us. choose any one of their 2025 greek adventures and find your home at sea. >> we'll also send you packing with these luxury travel gifts for another chance to win a prize worth over £20,000. text win to 63232. text costs £2 plus one standard network rate message , or post your name and message, or post your name and number to gb04, po box 8690. derby dh1 nine, double two uk only entrants must be 18 or oven only entrants must be 18 or over. lines closed at 5 pm. on the 26th of april. full terms and privacy notice @gbnews dot com forward slash win. please check the closing time if listening or watching on demand. good luck. >> look still to come more >> yeah, look still to come more of that breaking news tonight. the house of lords will not back down over the rwanda bill. and the parliamentary ping pong continues. on the continues. is rishi sunak on the bnnk continues. is rishi sunak on the brink actually, is this all brink or actually, is this all labour's ask tory labour's fault? i will ask tory mp greg what it means if mp greg smith what it means if his fails get flights his leader fails to get flights in but first he swiftly in the air. but first he swiftly became one of the most hated teenagers in the country for social stunts like this.

social media stunts like this. >> hello, can i call the police ? >> hello, can i call the police? the people on the train tearaway teen missy has just come out of prison and insists that now he's got his life in order. >> i will quiz him next. on whether he's honestly sorry for some of his rotten behaviour and if he has any sympathy for his poor victims, and if he has a message for people want to message for people who want to copy tuned.

welcome back to patrick christys. tonight on gb news. look. still to come after a convicted iraqi sex attacker offers to pay for his own deportation flight home. why have the home office still not removed him? tory mp greg smith has his say on that and the latest madness from the lords. but first, i welcome a controversial character to the studio who remembers missy? yes, it's the 19 year old londoner who caused outrage across social media last year, going viral for dangerous and sometimes criminal pranks these . pranks like these. >> let me get in here. >> let me get in here. >> we are sick . >> we are sick. >> we are sick. >> appg. hello. >> appg. hello. >> can i call the police ? the >> can i call the police? the people on the train. oh, hello. hi you got a nice dog. sorry. you got a nice dog. >> she's lovely. she's. >> she's lovely. she's. >> yes. emily's dog. don't run away with her. you're getting a whole lot of gangs outside. oh

hey. what she got on the whole fam? she actually got on the hill now. that's crazy. >> now, after combative interviews with piers morgan and bbc newsnight, missy was sent to prison in november after breaching an earlier court order that banned him from filming people without their consent. but release , the but since his release, the troubled teen is now trying to turn his life around . enrolling turn his life around. enrolling at college in a construction course and promising to do more to make his young child proud . to make his young child proud. missy, thank you very much for joining us here in the studio on gb news. how are you? >> thank you very much, patrick. i'm thank you inviting i'm well, thank you for inviting me on news. i'm very fine, me on gb news. i'm very fine, thank how are you? thank you. how are you? >> good. thank very much >> i'm good. thank you very much for in. now, look, do for coming in. now, look, i do just to you a bit about just want to ask you a bit about start with the positives. so what doing now, what you're doing right now, you're of you're on some kind of construction course and things like to just like that. do you want to just tell a little bit about that, tell us a little bit about that, so came out of jail, so when i came out of jail, like, obviously i in like, obviously when i was in jail, i had decisions to make and realising i have and i was realising that i have to for my child. so

to make right for my child. so i had a notepad and i was writing down and stuff, plans that down ideas and stuff, plans that i make when i come i was going to make when i come out jail. and one of those out of jail. and one of those was to get my cscs card because me criminal record me having a criminal record obviously be a lot obviously is going to be a lot harder for me to get a job. so i said, a cscs said, i'm going to get a cscs card, enrol for card, i'm going to enrol for a course because couple my course because a couple of my friends are doing the same thing. decided, yeah, i'm thing. so i decided, yeah, i'm going get course. i'm going to get this course. i'm going to get this course. i'm going 50. i was going to going to get, 50. i was going to pass pass it. i got pass it and i did pass it. i got 50 out 50, passed my 50 out of 50, passed my construction course, and i got my card. that's one of the my cscs card. that's one of the plans that wanted to make. plans that i wanted to make. >> and you were sent to >> good. and you were sent to prison. that prison. look, what was that like? bit of a wake like? was that a bit of a wake up you?i like? was that a bit of a wake up you? i mean, how up call for you? i mean, how long there as well? >> so i got sentenced to four months, basically. and in the uk, obviously you do of uk, obviously you do half of your a your sentence if it isn't a violent so meant to violent crime. so i was meant to do months, but i got out in do two months, but i got out in a month for good behaviour because really do because i didn't really do enough. just sitting my enough. i was just sitting in my cell reading it like cell reading what was it like for you in prison, obviously me being quite known, just being quite known, everyone just came they wanted to came up to me. they wanted to speak me. they wanted speak to me. they wanted to understand why i was in jail,

because obviously my pranks weren't they weren't too violent. they weren't too violent. they weren't were weren't too vicious. they were quite harmless. for me to be quite harmless. so for me to be in for pranks, people in jail for my pranks, people were questioning and asking me. so people just tried so a lot of people just tried to talk me, talk to me, understand me, understand coming understand where i'm coming from. fair , joe wasn't from. and to be fair, joe wasn't too bad. but i would never recommend joe even recommend joe because why would i recommend joe? but joe was not a place to be, and when i was in joe, it made me realise more that i had to change my around. so i to change my life around. so i didn't joe, didn't come back into joe, because place where because that's not a place where i keep myself in. i want to keep myself in. >> you did phrase >> now, you did say a phrase there that pranks weren't there that your pranks weren't too i think we have too harmless, i think we have played a couple of clips of some of them already, and we do have a couple more as well. there are some quite shocking things, really. you went into someone's house, went into a couple of people's houses. we've got a little clip of it now. let's just let's just take a little look at the random parts of their so. you're in their school. so. so you're in someone's there there. someone's house. there there. what we can't hear now is that people were very, very scared. there was also one where you

stole an elderly lady's dog as well , how do you feel stole an elderly lady's dog as well, how do you feel looking back at those things now ? back at those things now? >> so looking at, like, i don't like looking back at them because to me, they're a constant reminder of the negative things that i put into the world. like it's a constant reminder of my past and my like, i still bear the consequences of my actions. so looking back at them, they just as a constant reminder of the bad that i've put in and i hate looking at my old videos because it's like a stage in my life where i was quite unstable and i didn't have a support system around me to guide in the right direction. guide me in the right direction. so i was just doing whatever i wanted to do because of like wanted to do because of the like the way i grew up and the surroundings i was in. >> do you regret it? >> do you regret it? >> 100? i do regret it. and looking back at it, i would have never done what i had to do if i was in a suitable financial situation for myself. don't situation for myself. i don't what to it out what i had to do to make it out of i've put into. of what i've been put into. >> think some people might be >> i think some people might be concerned could go back

concerned that you could go back to that stuff. would you? concerned that you could go back to 100? that stuff. would you? concerned that you could go back to 100? no, stuff. would you? concerned that you could go back to 100? no, because ould you? concerned that you could go back to 100? no, because i've you? concerned that you could go back to 100? no, because i've already >> 100? no, because i've already learned that. what i've done is going to have consequences. all i've done, like i've been to jail twice, i've gotten section. i've been through the system so many different times in so many different ways, i'm still different ways, and i'm still here sane, calm , collective here as a sane, calm, collective person. and i just want to now preach my story to the youth and make sure they don't get into the same situation that i got into. and other media outlets. >> apparently this is the reason why i got in touch with you , why i got in touch with you, because i saw over the weekend it was on saturday. you tweeted something about how you you've done other done interviews with with other media and i think the media outlets and i think the insinuation that were insinuation was that they were all when you were doing insinuation was that they were all things, when you were doing insinuation was that they were all things, whetheyu were doing insinuation was that they were all things, whetheyu were (tong bad things, and they wanted to be of you when you were be a part of you when you were a really, really controversial character who up to no good character who was up to no good and now you have, as you say, you're turning your life around. you're you you're doing what you can. people really to people didn't really want to want to you is that is want to know. you is that is that true? do think you've that true? do you think you've been become less been kind of become less notorious now that you've

actually got yourself an internship apprenticeship, i internship or apprenticeship, i would so, yes, because even would say so, yes, because even bbc out to me, a couple bbc reached out to me, a couple of other news channels reached out wanting to do an out to me wanting to do an interview with me about my change. but when they've done the interview and i've shown them a person, like, yes, them me as a person, like, yes, i'm trying to change. i'm actually trying to change. i'm actually trying to change. i'm to better i'm actually trying to better myself my myself from for myself, my child, all the child, my family and all the people that i've hurt in the past from my pranks. i've said this the interviews and they this on the interviews and they haven't interview. they haven't lead the interview. they haven't lead the interview. they haven't the interview. haven't dropped the interview. the supposed haven't dropped the interview. th drop. supposed haven't dropped the interview. th drop. they supposed haven't dropped the interview. th drop. they didn't supposed haven't dropped the interview. th drop. they didn't dropjpposed haven't dropped the interview. th drop. they didn't dropjppised to drop. they didn't drop it. i was interview with the was on an interview with the guardian. they didn't as guardian. they didn't drop it as well. like because well. and i feel like because i'm trying enforce my i'm trying to enforce my positive change, they're not trying push it out there trying to push it out there because they want to promote negativity, because negativity sells sells in the sells controversy sells in the media. like i said before, you mentioned the media. >> there. understand that >> there. i understand that you're some of media you're doing some kind of media course is that right? course as well. is that right? yeah >> so i'm obviously right now i'm doing video. i'm currently doing a, video. i'm currently doing a, video. i'm internships. so i'm doing a, two internships. so i'm doing a, two internships. so i'm internship with i'm doing an internship with video production news as a journalist, where i write articles friday, and i'm articles every friday, and i'm also doing an internship at a, a

company called, sound bank in it. and it's basically i do digital marketing, but the company itself, they, promote creators, digital creators, and musicians and try, like, give them a to space create. so it's like a creative space. >> okay, now look , you did have >> okay, now look, you did have a lot of influence when you were doing your videos, right? you did have a lot of influence and that influence was really quite negative. and i've taken a bit of stick online tonight for having you on. people are saying, look, you shouldn't give this guy a plug, okay? >> seen it myself, man yeah. >> right. and i did want to >> all right. and i did want to give platform, but i also give you a platform, but i also want to give opportunity want to give you an opportunity to apologise to anyone that you might hurt, and also give a message now to people who might want to copy some of the things that you've done, because people have copied it. so is there anything you'd like to say about that? >> so the first thing you addressed, yeah, i do want to say because i did say

say sorry because i did say sorry interview. and sorry in the bbc interview. and that's thing they that's the only thing they put out a so don't know out as a clip. so i don't know why tried to do but why they tried to do that, but i'll say again on gb news i'll say it again on gb news here. i apologise to all the victims in the past that i've, may distress to you, victims in the past that i've, may have distress to you, victims in the past that i've, may have harassed,stress to you, victims in the past that i've, may have harassed, may; to you, victims in the past that i've, may have harassed, may have,»u, may have harassed, may have, mentally type mentally tormented in any type of to them of way. i apologise to them because didn't mean to do because i didn't mean to do that. having fun that. and i was just having fun at the moment, but i didn't realise that it would have negative repercussions and negative effects on their psychological of psychological like way of thinking . so i apologise for thinking. so i apologise for that. and also, the one thing i have to say to the young people is media isn't real. like is social media isn't real. like what portrayed the guys what i've portrayed to the guys on internet is that i'm this on the internet is that i'm this cool. oh yeah, we're outside. i don't give two . i don't know if don't give two. i don't know if i'm sorry. don't give a toss i'm sorry. i don't give a toss about but me as about anything but me as a person. i really do care. and for people to i don't really read comments on the internet because if i was to do that, i would probably go into a depressive state. but for everyone to what they're depressive state. but for every0|and» what they're depressive state. but for every0|and for what they're depressive state. but for every0|and for me1at they're depressive state. but for every0|and for me to they're depressive state. but for every0|and for me to realise saying and for me to realise that what i've done bad, you that what i've done is bad, you don't to go into the same don't want to go into the same tangent that i went on to, where it was just a constant cycle of

going jail, going to this, going to jail, going to this, and then continuing on the same thing because all know. and then continuing on the same thiri| because all know. and then continuing on the same thiri can:ause all know. and then continuing on the same thiri can saye all know. and then continuing on the same thiri can say to all know. and then continuing on the same thiri can say to you all know. and then continuing on the same thiri can say to you guys know. and then continuing on the same thiri can say to you guys isrow. all i can say to you guys is believe in yourself, and there's bigger things can do out bigger things you can do out there just being an there than just being an absolute menace on the internet or antisocial . like if you or being antisocial. like if you have ambitions like i wanted to, i read. i like music, i like to read. i like music, i want to , i want to go deeper want to, i want to go deeper into my passion so i understand me as a person and not what other people think i am. well that's what i really have to say. >> you've got a big opportunity ahead of you because you're young, okay? you are an articulate young man. you are obviously intelligent as well. when talk this . and i when you talk like this. and i really hope for your sake and for the of a lot of people for the sake of a lot of people who did take a negative influence what did influence from what you did initially , that you really don't initially, that you really don't go back down route, because go back down that route, because i you've got you've got i think you've got you've got the now, got the potential now, you've got a bit platform and you've got bit of a platform and you've got everything going for you. you could make real positive could make a real positive change, because that route that i the route for i went down isn't the route for me . me. >> obviously i have a child as well, and i to be there not

well, and i have to be there not just for me, but for my child, for my child's mother, for my mother. i have to there for mother. i have to be there for a lot of people. it's not just me . lot of people. it's not just me. so to put in the work and so i need to put in the work and show the results. mess it show the results. don't mess it up 100. >> right, look, missy, thank >> all right, look, missy, thank you very and just a quick you very much. and just a quick apology bit fruity apology for a bit of fruity language. there you know, language. there but, you know, we're adults here, aren't we're all adults here, aren't we? look, missy, you we? so, look, missy, thank you very luck. okay. very much. and good luck. okay. thank patrick. right. thank you. patrick. all right. okay. coming up, okay. now, look, coming up, should accounts of should the bank accounts of benefits claimants be monitored, is to smack a child is it ever okay to smack a child ? doctors are furious at a legal loophole that allows to parents do just that. reform mp lee anderson is unleashed, and he's on this show very shortly. but next, house of has next, the house of lords has snubbed ministerial calls to back the rwanda bill. back down on the rwanda bill. it's sunak's premiership it's rishi sunak's premiership now in jeopardy. plus, an unidentified rapist who unidentified iraqi rapist who lied his way into britain. even labour mps are dumbfounded by this, who lied about his name and country of origin, is a convicted sex offender who has breached the terms of his licence and the courts want him returned home.

>> he wants to return home and will even pay for his flight. >> but all of that with top tory mp greg smith and it's

all right. welcome back to patrick christys. tonight look. still to come. should those receiving benefits have their bank accounts monitored? and is it okay smack your child it ever okay to smack your child reform uk's lee anderson gives his no nonsense take on both of those but first to that

those things. but first to that breaking news tonight, what you're is the you're looking at there is the house of the rwanda bill house of lords. the rwanda bill shambles after the shambles continues after the government suffered two more defeats house lords defeats in the house of lords this evening. peers in this evening. peers voted in favour amendments, favour of two amendments, meaning the bill will be meaning that the bill will be sent back to the commons for the fifth time on monday, putting pay fifth time on monday, putting pay government's pay to the government's expectations that the bill would become by the end of the become law by the end of the week. the home secretary, week. well the home secretary, james kicked back, james cleverly, has kicked back, he terrified that the he says, terrified that the rwanda scheme will work and desperate delay disrupt desperate to delay or disrupt over votes stopping over 100 votes about stopping the boats, labour have acted again to block the passage of the rwanda bill. it's been another politically cynical effort by them who have no alternative deterrent and no plan to tackle illegal immigration, to frustrate the only solution on offer. we welcome now conservative mp greg smith. greg, thank you very, very much. i mean, is this all labour's fault really? >> well, we'd have a bill, we'd have an act, we'd have it through. we'd be off to the king for royal assent. if labour hadnt for royal assent. if labour hadn't whipped their members in the tonight to the house of lords tonight to frustrate again. i

frustrate this yet again. and i can you, patrick, on frustrate this yet again. and i can doorsteps datrick, on frustrate this yet again. and i can doorsteps in rick, on frustrate this yet again. and i can doorsteps in my, on the doorsteps in my constituency, the doorsteps constituency, on the doorsteps of nearby colleagues who i'm helping this helping and supporting in this campaign , people want the boats campaign, people want the boats stopped . and it's the labour stopped. and it's the labour party in the house of lords that have frustrated this now in excess of 100 times. we can't trust labour on this. this is the party that constantly signs the party that constantly signs the letters saying , you know, the letters saying, you know, don't deport the foreign national offenders. this is the party that goes through the voting lobbies in the commons and to stop all the and the lords to stop all the legislation we've passed try legislation we've passed to try and this . and resolve this. >> labour. labour will say that the that this a the public know that this is a cornerstone of conservative party all party policy. yet all the opinion polls that labour opinion polls show that labour are probably going to win the next general election. so therefore might the therefore they might be on the side of people by rejecting side of the people by rejecting this , can you from the this, i can tell you from the doorsteps, can tell you when doorsteps, i can tell you when i did my summer surgery tour last summer, the number of people who came me, the absolute came up to see me, the absolute tip of their tongue, you've got to stop the boats. >> this is the thing we're

looking at you to now. we've looking at you to do now. we've got okay it's taken a got the plan. okay it's taken a while. i put my hands up and accept that . but we've got a accept that. but we've got a fresh bit of legislation that hopefully will resolve the problems we've had with the courts, the problems we've had with all the activists trying to frustrate this policy . the real frustrate this policy. the real frustrators are the labour party . they're the lefties in the house of lords. they're the left is in the house of commons who troop through those voting lobbies this from happening. >> i mean, there has been i will just slightly push back and say there's bit kickback there's been a bit of kickback from within party as from within your own party as well. arguably well. but, this is arguably one of things like of the reasons why things like the many people the rwanda built, many people think important. okay, think are so important. okay, i've a couple stories i've got a couple of stories here iraqi sex here for you. so an iraqi sex offender in britain offender remains in britain despite offering to pay for his own flight home, with the home office failing to authorise his deportation. >> nigel, minister's >> nigel, the minister's attention to the of a man attention to the case of a man in newport who lied his in newport who lied about his name country origin, is a name and country of origin, is a convicted offender who has convicted sex offender who has breached the terms of his licence and the courts want him

returned home. he wants to returned home. he wants to return and even pay return home and will even pay for flight . but return home and will even pay for flight. but for some for his flight. but for some unfathomable reason , the home unfathomable reason, the home office seem incapable of allowing or authorising or allowing or authorising or allowing this, and it's been three years. why >> the issue is because he's on the sex offenders register and needs permission from british authorities. but let's just go through again, okay? did he through it again, okay? did he lie about his age? yes. did he lie about his age? yes. did he lie about his nationality? yes. did he lie about his name? yes. has he been convicted of sex and drug yes. has he been drug offences? yes. has he been deported , no. no. there we go. deported, no. no. there we go. look, greg, what's going on here at the home office? >> i'm not going to attempt to defend the indefensible in that there no reason what so ever there is no reason what so ever that that guy should still be in the united kingdom . and it's got the united kingdom. and it's got to be something the home office have got to get a grip on. it's got to be something. he's got to be out of there. look, he's even offered to pay for his own flight. well, good. let's take offered to pay for his own fligmoney.., good. let's take offered to pay for his own fligmoney. ., goo get et's take offered to pay for his own fligmoney.., goo get him ake of his money. let's get him out of the united there no

the united kingdom. there is no grounds national grounds for foreign national offenders, for who have offenders, for people who have committed the most heinous crimes. about getting crimes. and lied about getting here in first place. to here in the first place. to remain in our country. and i can only i'm not going to only repeat, i'm not going to defend the indefensible on this. it's something the home office have better at. have got to get better at. >> i mean, people be >> yeah, i mean, people will be screaming screens now. screaming at the tv screens now. i've got 14 years, greg. 14 i've got a 14 years, greg. 14 years and here we are. and i just don't think that's necessarily good enough, really. we've got we've got the home office here saying, now the farce the english channel farce in the english channel continues evidence continues with fresh evidence emerging. oh, no, sorry. i've got home office statement for got a home office statement for you actually long you here. actually or a long standing that standing government policy that we do not comment on individual cases. there we go. that was worthwhile. now the farce in the engush worthwhile. now the farce in the english channel continues with fresh evidence emerging of the french migrant fresh evidence emerging of the frenciacross migrant fresh evidence emerging of the frenciacross the migrant fresh evidence emerging of the frenciacross the water migrant fresh evidence emerging of the frenciacross the water to grant fresh evidence emerging of the frenciacross the water to thet fresh evidence emerging of the frenciacross the water to the uk boats across the water to the uk . and when they got in the way of one english cargo ship outside the captain outside dunkirk, the captain decided enough. outside dunkirk, the captain deciied enough. outside dunkirk, the captain deci would enough. outside dunkirk, the captain deci would like enough. outside dunkirk, the captain deci would like to enough. outside dunkirk, the captain deci would like to report,]h. outside dunkirk, the captain deci would like to report, what >> i would like to report, what is an illegal operation in the french waters ? this morning we

french waters? this morning we witnessed a vessel and a french warship escort , a boatload of warship escort, a boatload of illegal immigrants across the channel to the midway point where they handed them over to another ship out of dover, which is now arrived in dover. this is not search and rescue. this is the illegal trafficking of human personnel . i have now reported personnel. i have now reported this to the uk authorities . this to the uk authorities. >> i mean, the french acting as a taxi service for illegal migrants here. >> look, we've given them an absolute ton of money to try and help us. they claim that they want the illegal crossings to be stopped as well. it's damaging their economy, their coastline. yeah. a warship in the english channelin yeah. a warship in the english channel in french waters escorting an illegal crossing into british waters. i think

we've got to have a serious word with the french authorities here, with the french government, because they can't take our money in, in good faith, in the interests of stopping these illegal crossings , stopping the people smugglers, stopping the abuse of human beings in the english channel, and then finding them in their own waters and actively bringing them into british waters. that is wholly unacceptable. that is not something that anybody expects from a friend, from an ally , from another country who ally, from another country who is supposedly helping us in this endeavoun is supposedly helping us in this endeavour. if you find an illegal crossing, if you find a craft in your own waters , is the craft in your own waters, is the duty falls on the french government to bring that craft back to the french coast and to process those people appropriately through the asylum system, through whatever it might be. it is certainly not acceptable for a foreign

government to escort an illegal crossing into somebody else's waters. >> i think some people are saying, well, why? why did we pick them up then? are we just a bit too nice ? bit too nice? >> nobody wants to see people die the channel, die in the channel, right? i don't want to people die in don't want to see people die in the i don't want to the channel. i don't want to see human beings suffering. so human beings suffering. and so once they find into once they find themselves into our we're in a very our waters, we're in a very difficult position. i think it is the human thing to do to ensure that they're not in peril. on the sea. however, we've been very clear as a parliament, we've been very clear as a conservative government that illegal entry into this country is under acceptable. and that's why we're trying to get the rwanda bill through. that's why there's a whole series of measures being taken stop these crossings taken to stop these crossings and ensure that people can't stay they enter stay here if they enter illegally. the french really haven't this case. haven't helped in this case. greg thank you very, very much. >> that's conservative mp there greg smith. look, in response, the informed the coastguard informed the individual video. individual in that video. that was an arrangement the was an arrangement between the british governments british and french governments for navy to escort

for the french navy to escort migrant boats towards the uk, which, is not which, you know, is not particularly great, i think. is it, there is also a response here from the government which says with france in the says we work with france in the engush says we work with france in the english channel to ensure people are as are recovered as safely as possible, successful work possible, are successful work together, help to cut arrivals by than third. year. by more than a third. last year. okay. all right. well, look, earlier shadow earlier today, labour shadow home yvette cooper home secretary yvette cooper said on the rwanda mps said on the rwanda bill tory mps just to insist that afghan just voted to insist that afghan interpreters who've served british can be sent british armed forces can be sent to rwanda, a scheme which cost £2 million per asylum seeker, a £500 million scheme for less than 1% of asylum seekers, which now includes those who work with our troops, shameful and our troops, says shameful and shambolic , she says. but shambolic, she says. but obviously we do await a little bit more detail on what smashed the gangs means from labour, which, as it currently stands , which, as it currently stands, means precious little. but anyway, at 10 pm, anyway, coming up at 10 pm, we've heard how we've already heard how they're bused luxury coaches. okay, bused into luxury coaches. okay, but i'm about to show you exclusive footage of what they're up to inside the bibby stockholm barge. and i think this raises serious questions over the human rights line about

this being some kind of prison ship. okay, so stay tuned for that. ship. okay, so stay tuned for that . but next, the dwp plans to that. but next, the dwp plans to snoop on benefits claim as bank accounts to recover accounts in a bid to recover £600 million lost to fraud. is it justified or is it orwellian ? it justified or is it orwellian? and is it ever okay to smack a child reform mp lee anderson is chomping at the as

next. welcome back to patrick christys tonight. look coming up. woke middle class left wingers claim the bibby stockholm is inhumane. but i've uncovered shocking new footage that shows what life is really like on that migrant barge. but first, lawyers have slammed government to slammed government plans to monitor bank accounts of monitor the bank accounts of benefits claimants. they say it's orwellian. the department for pensions wants new for work and pensions wants new powers banks to trawl powers to require banks to trawl the accounts of benefits recipients in to order catch welfare cheats, but the civil liberties group big brother watch has warned the plans risked breaking privacy and

freedom of expression laws. we'll get this because an astonishing £7.3 billion of your money taxpayers cash, was lost to benefits fraud last year. so is it really such a bad idea to monitor their bank accounts? i'm joined now by reform uk mp lee anderson. leigh should we be snooping on potential benefits cheats ? cheats? >> well, there's always exceptions to that. well, i say no . to start off with patrick. no. to start off with patrick. there's always exceptions to the rule . rule. >> i mean, if they're snooping on angela rayner's bank account over the past ten years, they might have known where she actually but seriously, might have known where she actually make but seriously, might have known where she actually make enough ously, might have known where she actually make enough stakes in, the dup make enough stakes in, co*ck ups of their own, and then they say they need to snoop on people's bank accounts. i'm sorry . get your own house in sorry. get your own house in order. benefit fraud should not be being committed. they have the tools in place to sort this out. i think this, you know, when you consider patrick, that, you there's millions and you know, there's millions and millions of people in this country not just country on benefits, not just working age people out working age people, people out of etc. you of work and pensioners, etc. you know, do they want really want

the dwp snooping into their own affairs? because if you start poking around in bank accounts , poking around in bank accounts, you're looking at what people are money on, are spending their money on, direct whatever it's it direct debits, whatever it's it is and the dwp are, is orwellian. and the dwp are, you know, a bit like the home office at the moment. they make a mistake after mistake we've seen during covid, the wasted billions of pounds they doled out to people on dodgy loans and stuff like that. so it's a big fat from me. fat no from me. >> we lost. we lost £11 billion over two years to benefits fraud. i mean that is real money. that's real hard working people's money in the middle of a cost of living crisis. and i've really think we deserve i've really i think we deserve an , don't we? an apology, don't we? >> it's not just that, >> well, it's not just that, patrick, but, know, when patrick, but, you know, when these people are actually caught and sometimes we've and we see it sometimes we've seen the bulgarian seen it with the bulgarian benefit week on benefit fraudsters, last week on your show when these people are caught and if it's just i mean, sometimes only a few thousand pounds, but it's a lot of money. it's taxpayers they're it's taxpayers money. they're not given a severe enough penalty. i mean, ijust lock

them up. i would and actually make them go to work once they've defrauded the dwp, the taxpayer, to taxpayer, make them go to work and pay debt off. all and pay that debt off. all right. look, i've got right. well, look, i've got a right. well, look, i've got a right reply from the department for pensions. they've for work and pensions. they've said watches said big brother watches claims that these measures that dwp will use these measures to reveal information about people's movements, opinions and medical information are entirely false. these measures will require third parties to provide only limited, relevant information may signal information that may signal whether benefits are being improperly paid. it does not give dwp access to anyone's bank account, see how claimants account, or see how claimants are spending their money. it's a question believability with question of believability with that , isn't it? i that stuff, though, isn't it? i think, it slippery think, and is it a slippery slope? lee, i'm keen to talk slope? but lee, i'm keen to talk to you about this because a group of leading doctors have called banned called for parents to be banned from kids because from smacking their kids because they long term they say it leads to long term violence mental health violence and mental health problems life. now, problems in later life. now, currently, is currently, hitting a child is illegal scotland and illegal in both scotland and wales , but a loophole in england wales, but a loophole in england and northern allows to and northern ireland allows to parents smack their child if it can counted as reasonable can be counted as reasonable punishment . can be counted as reasonable punishment. so, can be counted as reasonable punishment . so, lee, can be counted as reasonable punishment. so, lee, is it ever okay to smack a child ?

okay to smack a child? >> it is. and we have to make a distinction between smacking a child for bad behaviour and, you know, a beating . and nobody know, a beating. and nobody wants to see children being hurt in this way. but i think responsible parenting, you know, carrot and stick approach to parenting, which a lot of good parents choose, is the right thing to do. some of these paediatricians, these doctors, whatever i think they need to put out a little bit. patrick, you know, i see children going to neck of the to school in my neck of the woods got kids . woods who've got obese kids. we've got kids. kids can't dress themselves. got kids who themselves. we've got kids who can't go the toilet when they can't go to the toilet when they start school at 5, we start school at 4 or 5, we should be concentrating on this, the basics, making sure that our young have got the, you young children have got the, you know, the basic skills to go through this is just through school. this is just this is just nonsense. you know, we're turning out it down here in london now. we're seeing young men, predominantly young men. you know, they're leaving school, they've had bad parenting, and they're turning to crime. >> p— to crime. >.child? you smacked a child? >> yes, was smacked. and my >> yes, i was smacked. and my dad be watching now .

dad will be watching this now. and i and i look back fondly on my thrashings. no seriously, i and i and i look back fondly on my �*arashings. no seriously, i and i and i look back fondly on my �*a ishings. no seriously, i and i and i look back fondly on my �*a i had gs. no seriously, i and i and i look back fondly on my �*a i had a. no seriously, i and i and i look back fondly on my �*a i had a ino seriously, i and i and i look back fondly on my �*a i had a i had eriously, i and i and i look back fondly on my �*a i had a i had the jsly, i and i and i look back fondly on my'a i had a i had the odd i and i and i look back fondly on my �*a i had a i had the odd clip had a i had a i had the odd clip around the ear or and i tell you what, patrick. and when we i, i went to school at the time when, when headmaster while he when our headmaster while he wore three piece pinstripe wore a three piece pinstripe suit under his arm at suit stick under his arm at junior school and if he will be charged, misbehaved got charged, misbehaved, you got a quick whack stick. quick whack with a stick. nowadays at school nowadays you turn up at school and some headmistress with pink tights, and stud tights, pink hair and a stud through the nose wanting hug through the nose wanting to hug everybody. nonsense. everybody. it's nonsense. >> we go, lee >> well, there we go, lee anderson. no nonsense as ever. all right , anderson. no nonsense as ever. all right, you take care. all the best, lee. i'll see you next time. all right. that was reform uk. and lee, you agree with uk. and lee, do you agree with them? you not look up them? do you not look coming up though head to head though in the head to head following this bombshell cast report that exposed, report that is exposed, our british were given british kids were given a harmful puberty blockers despite little's no evidence of little's and no evidence of their safety. should former their safety. should the former chief executive of lgbt charity stonewall, who, remarkably, by the way, is a baroness , lose her the way, is a baroness, lose her peerage. but next, as a legal migrants have been spotted at

bibby stockholm barge without care in the world. so there they go. look, we've got some footage for you. i've got exclusive and eye opening footage to show you from inside the bibby stockholm barge. campaigners say it's inhumane, but what i'm about to show you will suggest very strongly. otherwise, this is patrick christys tonight. we're only on gb news now. it's your weather with deakin. weather with alex deakin. >> that warm feeling inside from boxt boilers , sponsors of boxt boilers, sponsors of weather on . gb news. weather on. gb news. >> time for your latest weather update from the met office here on gb news. good evening. temperatures dropping away tonight. it's going to be a cold start tomorrow. much of the south will stay fine, but further rain and further north some rain and cloud moving thanks to this cloud moving in thanks to this little pressure little area of low pressure that's ahead of that's drifting south. ahead of that, a couple of that, we've had a couple of weather fronts bringing some that, we've had a couple of weattoday,�*nts bringing some that, we've had a couple of weattoday, particularlyi some that, we've had a couple of weattoday, particularly forme rain today, particularly for northern ireland that's now spreading south parts of spreading south across parts of pembrokeshire, and pembrokeshire, devon and cornwall clearing through pembrokeshire, devon and cornevening, clearing through pembrokeshire, devon and cornevening, furtherng through pembrokeshire, devon and cornevening, further showersjh

this evening, further showers across eastern england, they'll steadily fade as well. and where we've the clear skies, we've got the clear skies, southern scotland, northwest england , wales a hint of blue on england, wales a hint of blue on the chart suggesting there will be a frost. certainly in the countryside, and countryside, most towns and cities about staying cities just about staying above freezing , but certainly chilly freezing, but certainly a chilly start for many start to thursday for many a bright sunny start. there could be some showers early on across kent. they should fade, but rain will into the highlands of will creep into the highlands of scotland, the western isles first thing, and that'll spread across most of scotland by lunchtime. parts the north lunchtime. parts of the north and northern ireland and east of northern ireland seeing rain through seeing some rain and through the afternoon, over afternoon, turning damp over northern england and north wales. the south wales. but much of the south will and bright. we will stay dry and bright. we could 15 in london. could reach 15 in london. a brighter day across east anglia , brighter day across east anglia, cooler with the cooler further north, with the winds and those brisk winds picking up and those brisk winds picking up and those brisk winds then a feature of the weather friday well. weather on friday as well. friday broadly speaking, a mixture of sunshine showers, mixture of sunshine and showers, a duller day across the south—east and a much wetter day across east anglia compared to tomorrow. feeling chilly again across east anglia compared to tomcthat. feeling chilly again across east anglia compared to tomcthat windsrg chilly again across east anglia compared to tomcthat winds much ly again across east anglia compared to tomcthat winds much of again across east anglia compared to tomcthat winds much of northern with that winds much of northern ireland scotland having a drier day but still on the fresh side.

>> 8 to 14 degrees looks like things are heating up . boxt things are heating up. boxt boilers sponsors of weather on

gb news. >> it's 10 pm. i'm patrick christys tonight. an exclusive inside the bibby stockholm barge. >> and so the controversial decision is, do you let sarah take a take a puberty blocker ? take a take a puberty blocker? >> pre—puberty. and the medical view is. yes, you do. so, in fact, it's pretty safe . fact, it's pretty safe. >> why is this woman facing calls to be sacked ? and the calls to be sacked? and the house of lords does the unthinkable on rwanda? also, who's in the wrong here? look very closely. yeah, we'll reveal all later. i've got tomorrow's newspaper front pages tonight with the director of popular conservatives mark littlewood, businessman adam brookes and author rebecca reid. oh, yes.

and we have to address, don't we? the elephant in the room. get ready. britain. here we go. exclusive footage from the bibby stockholm . next. stockholm. next. >> at one minute, after ten, the top story from the gb newsroom tonight is that the government's flagship illegal migration policy, the rwanda bill had another major setback, suffering another major setback, suffering a defeat in the house of lords. peers maintained pressure on the government over his deportation plan. rishi sunaks deportation plan, that is, with continual demands for reassurances in the form of amendments. the house of lords ignored ministerial calls to back down and again tonight insisted on further revisions to the safety of rwanda bill. the home secretary, james cleverly ,

home secretary, james cleverly, said afterwards we want to break the criminal people smuggling gangs and stop the boats. laboun gangs and stop the boats. labour, uncomfortable with tackling immigration, will clearly stop at nothing to stop the planes is in other news today, a 28 year old man convicted of attempting to murder two elderly worshippers in mosques in london and birmingham in what a judge described as horrific attacks, has been sentenced to an indefinite hospital order. mohamed abshir, who has paranoid schizophrenia , threw petrol over schizophrenia, threw petrol over his victims and then set them alight outside the mosques. the court heard that 82 year old hashi odowa and 70 year old mohamed riaz were chosen at random because abshir believed they were possessed by evil spirits. mohamed riyas junior said his father's attacker should have been sent to prison to face the maximum sentence. >> mohamed apcar, who set my father on fire. he's not going to serve a prison sentence , but to serve a prison sentence, but he's going to be going to a hospital. probably get served a

three course meal and have an evening cup of tea, whereas he should be in a prison , you know, should be in a prison, you know, facing, you know, maximum, maximum punishment, especially setting two people on fire in two main cities of the united kingdom. you're talking about london and birmingham. i mean, how could this happen ? how could this happen? >> hugh grant, the actor, has settled a legal case against the publisher of the sun over claims journalist used private investigators to tap his phone and burgle his home. the actor's lawsuit was one of those eligible to go to trial at the high court, but he's come to an agreement with news group, newspapers , papers. prince harry newspapers, papers. prince harry is also among several other high profile figures also suing the paper for alleged unlawful information gathering, which the publisher denies . now thousands publisher denies. now thousands of uk passengers have had flights cancelled or delayed after dubai international airport was closed due to

unprecedented flooding after rainfall in the region. the emirates airline , just one of emirates airline, just one of the airlines cancelling a number of flights between uae and the uk. british airways also diverting routes away from the aftermath of those storms, which include flooded roads, metro system flooded and even shopping malls flooded as well. the airport urging passengers to stay away after it was hit by more than a year's rainfall in 24 hours. in fact, animals were lost as well, including this cat. if you're watching on television clinging to a car doorin television clinging to a car door in flood water but was rescued by dubai police and put on their boat and taken to safety. poor wee thing. that's what you call a perfect rescue and a meteorologist are saying more bad weather, including thunderstorms are on the way, likely to cause severe disruption across the desert city in the coming days. if you're thinking of heading to the middle east, think again . the middle east, think again. for the latest stories. do sign up to gb news alerts , scan the up to gb news alerts, scan the qr code on your screen or go to gb news. com slash alerts .

gb news. com slash alerts. >> there is a campaign by what appears to be mostly middle aged and elderly, middle class left wingers to close the bibby stockholm barge. they say it's like a prison ship, that it's inhumane and human beings shouldn't be forced to live in those conditions. these include people like the portland global friendship group. now they have a link to the website free movement.org .uk on their facebook page, and they work very closely with immigration barristers, who many people believe are little more than activists in a wig. you've got to stand up racism, dorset and the usual bunch at care for calais. they're all piping up. okay, well, gb news has come into possession of videos that appear to be taken by asylum seekers on the barge. now, remember this is the supposedly inhumane floating prison that we're talking about .

inhumane floating prison that we're talking about. here. yes, on. as you can see, there appears to be quite a happy bunch of young men dancing, playing pool and relaxing . now, obviously the relaxing. now, obviously the experience is different for everyone, but they seem in good spirits there. you can see that is the inside of the bibby stockholm because there were videos taken from inside it before it opened. there is also a place where they can watch films, and they can drink cans of red bull as well . yeah, i of red bull as well. yeah, i mean, this looks a lot like the video room previously advertised on the ship, doesn't it? so there they are . this is a there they are. this is a taxpayer funded bus service as well that allows the bibby stockholm residents to go into the town now on the same

snapchat account that posted the previous videos. all right. there is also this video recording. now . the video itself appears to now. the video itself appears to show the inside of a gun and knife shop around the weymouth area. now we know that that shop exists and that it is in the vicinity near the bibby stockholm barge, but we cannot verify whether that video was taken by someone who's living on the bibby stockholm barge. it was simply posted on the same snapchat cam . well, none of this snapchat cam. well, none of this seems particularly inhumane or prison like. does it? especially not that last video. another video on that account appears to have been taken from inside a co*cktail bar. storm ciaran. now,

it may be that that video was taken by an individual before he was moved to the bibby stockholm , but again, it does beg the question, it? are asylum question, doesn't it? are asylum seekers really treated as badly as middle class middle as these middle class middle aged human rights warriors like to believe ? portland global to believe? portland global friendship group organised events as well. like this with bibi residents. this is this woodland adventure that they've got. all right. there is a medical facility on the barge as well, which is available. our home security mark home security editor, mark white, went onto the barge and was impressed by the facilities. it all previously been used to house oil workers, house people like oil workers, etc. now, look, i am not saying that the barge is a five star hotel and i am aware that one individual with mental health issues sadly took their own life on the barge. and it goes without saying that that is a tragedy. but the videos tragedy. but given the videos that shown you there that i have just shown you there and facilities we know are and the facilities we know are on offer at that site, and the fact that asylum seekers have in

some cases access to many some cases better access to many pubuc some cases better access to many public services than arguably most of people in britain do most of the people in britain do you honestly think now that groups for calais, groups like care for calais, portland, global friendship actually think the conditions on that ship are inhumane? or is there a political agenda at play here? let's get the thoughts of my panel this evening. we're joined by the director of popular conservatives , mark popular conservatives, mark little. we've got businessman and activist adam brooks and journalist and author rebecca reid . mark, some of those videos reid. mark, some of those videos there don't really look too much like a prison ship to me. >> no. that's right. look, you were very fair, patrick, in saying, look, it's just a snapshot. it's a snippet. we can't, you know, be totally sure who took these videos and when. but my rough would be this . but my rough view would be this. that when we're housing asylum seekers, it should be in something like youth hostel accommodation. i mean, remember, this was closed down for legionnaires disease. i don't mean rat infested sort of places, but that looked pretty

high end at a glance. but the problem to my mind is this it's not so much the nature of the accommodation. often it's the length of time it takes to process all of this, right? so if we close, you know, we open this up because the too much burden on hotels at the moment . burden on hotels at the moment. but it is taking 18 months or so to even process this. you were talking to greg smith mp earlier on the show about these sort of things. the problem to my mind isn't much the quality of the isn't so much the quality of the accommodation, that we accommodation, it's that we should to make a should be able to make a decision year decision in days, not not a year and a half. >> and i want to just really focus the fact that you've focus on the fact that you've got some groups, these got some of these groups, these local are after local groups who are after a pubuc local groups who are after a public on this, local groups who are after a publwant on this, local groups who are after a publwant to on this, local groups who are after a publwant to take on this, local groups who are after a publwant to take iton this, local groups who are after a publwant to take iton court. they want to take it to court. and this is inhumane. they say the these people are the conditions these people are in are inhumane. and i just i think those videos blow the lid off that. >> yeah, i'm disgusted at what i've just seen. i mean, i've been calling this out and many others have for, for many years. asylum seekers are legal . asylum seekers are legal. immigrants are treated better than some of the people in this

country. now, if i'm a poor person sitting watching the telly at home, i will be depressed looking at that . they depressed looking at that. they get fed three times a day. they get fed three times a day. they get a bed , a roof over their get a bed, a roof over their heads, they get free healthcare, they get free travel locally, they get free travel locally, they get free mental health support . you've got people in support. you've got people in this country that have to wait months to get their tooth looked at, or to see a doctor . months to get their tooth looked at, or to see a doctor. this is at, or to see a doctor. this is a disgrace. i want to see these people put in a detention camp with big gates that they can't get out and they can't go to local towns, and that will deter these people crossing the channel. i've had enough and so is britain. rebecca. >> it's not inhumane to put people on that, is it? with those facilities on offer and some of the videos i've just showed. >> mark. mark is absolutely right. the right. it's not about the facilities. when they got that boat, were supposed to be facilities. when they got that boatthat?3 supposed to be facilities. when they got that boatthat? sofa's supposed to be facilities. when they got that boatthat? sofa's too josed to be facilities. when they got that boatthat? sofa's too nicei to be facilities. when they got that boatthat? sofa's too nice to» be like that? sofa's too nice to take it out that telly's too big. take it out. that would have stupid. is have been stupid. the issue is it's inhumane because of the amount takes to amount of time it takes to process, that's bad for process, and that's bad for everyone. bad it everyone. it's bad because it

costs money them. it's costs money to host them. it's bad because they can't get on with issue with their lives. the issue is that inhumane leave that it's inhumane to leave people 18 months, people in limbo for 18 months, sort the processing. really? what's. >> but i get you're saying. >> but i get what you're saying. absolutely. they're too absolutely. well, they're too happy. argued by happy. turn the music argued by the that portland happy. turn the music argued by the friendship'ortland happy. turn the music argued by the friendship group.i global friendship group. correct. or they are fundamentally my fundamentally saying, oh my gosh, poor people. gosh, look at these poor people. >> cooped up they're >> they're cooped up and they're treated there plenty of treated like there are plenty of people left. also, people on the left. and also, by the it's really bad the way, i think it's really bad that we keep saying middle aged elderly because somebody elderly. just because somebody is elderly does is middle aged or elderly does not their opinion is not mean that their opinion is any valid. no, any less valid. no, specifically, we specifically, i know, but we shouldn't use middle age, in a in because it's in a derogatory way because it's coming you . just coming for you. just a description, anyway, my description, but anyway, my point i, i think there are point is, i, i think there are people in this country who want to see these people suffer who don't like to see people dancing and a time. the and having a good time. but the thing is, one would they thing is, in one would they shouldn't here in would shouldn't be here in one would scrubs. have christmas shouldn't be here in one would scrubs.on have christmas shouldn't be here in one would scrubs.on christmas|ristmas shouldn't be here in one would scrubs.on christmas|ristmathink dinner on christmas day. i think that probably from i'd. that video is probably from i'd. people to find people have an ability to find small any circ*mstance small joys in any circ*mstance just surviving just because they're surviving doesn't mean that it's okay. the co*cktail which co*cktail bar, which is definitely not taken in this country. can it as country. you can hear it as non—english language music in

the . the background. >> found the low >> we've we've found the low co*cktail we know where co*cktail bar where we know where it i'm not going to it is. well, i'm not going to reveal here on air, we reveal it here on air, but we don't know that was taken don't know that that was taken when were in bibian. when they were in bibian. >> i don't know can hear >> i don't know that i can hear the here. the point here. >> it goes to your point, >> it goes back to your point, patrick. look, i'm some patrick. look, i'm i've got some sympathy with rebecca is sympathy with what rebecca is saying. think you should saying. i don't think you should deliberately the deliberately rip out the television be harsher. television just to be harsher. if you're if you happened to. but you're quite it's quite right, patrick, that it's difficult, we've seen, difficult, from what we've seen, to conditions as to describe those conditions as inhumane. to do so to inhumane. and to do so seems to me preposterous. me pretty preposterous. those are not think anyone is conditions. are not think anyone is coniitions. think anyone. i think >> i don't think anyone. i think that the legionnaires disease thing was was inhumane. >> dealt with obviously >> that was dealt with obviously get the ship. >> that was dealt with obviously get let's1e ship. >> that was dealt with obviously get let's remember these >> let's remember these charities these times, these charities in these times, these lawyers have in the past have tried that living on tried to say that living on water, know, is some sort of water, you know, is some sort of bad thing them when they've bad thing for them when they've just come across just they've just come across the in a now, the channel in a dinghy. now, they weren't in the they weren't living in the dinghy. going be dinghy. they're not going to be distressed but these distressed by that. but these charities these lawyers charities and these lawyers are the this country. the enemy of this country. we cannot accept that. this amount of people coming over each week, each day , these i'd say 90% of each day, these i'd say 90% of these people are not refugees or

asylum seekers. they are illegal immigrants that are trying to play immigrants that are trying to play our system. and again, if you speak from if you speak to most people in any high road, they've had enough of this. >> can i just mark, do you >> can i just ask mark, do you think their heart of hearts, think in their heart of hearts, the people of these the people like some of these charity and the people charity groups and the people who know, in local who are, you know, in the local area that variety of area that are these variety of different groups, do different community groups, do you honestly believe you think they honestly believe that these people are being kept in inhumane conditions? do you or it political? in inhumane conditions? do you or i it political? in inhumane conditions? do you or ithinkitical? in inhumane conditions? do you or i think it's l? in inhumane conditions? do you or i think it's about social >> i think it's about social virtue signalling, patrick, that it's the equivalent of saying, oh, i don't watch gb news and i hate the daily mail that you join a campaign group to say, i, i'm just signalling that i care about the, you know, asylum seekers and people from another race syndrome. so, yes , a nice race syndrome. so, yes, a nice person. some people might call it it's but it seems to me such an odd all those horrid show offs being kind and doing charity work, what are they like? >> but they virtue signalling you are being disingenuous. >> if you could really show

pictures know, rat pictures of, you know, rat infested accommodation evidence that people were not being fed, that people were not being fed, that would be one thing. but it seems to me on himself, because living there was so awful . well, living there was so awful. well, i yeah, there's a tragic i mean, yeah, there's a tragic suicide. touched that suicide. patrick touched on that . but really see here . but i can't really see here how somebody could say, hand on heart, but this looks inhumane . heart, but this looks inhumane. but it just doesn't. >> it's not inhumane because the sofas aren't comfortable enough. it's inhumane it's an it's inhumane because it's an inhumane to live in. it's inhumane because it's an inh but ne to live in. it's inhumane because it's an inh but if, to live in. it's inhumane because it's an inh but if, if, to live in. it's inhumane because it's an inh but if, if, if to live in. it's inhumane because it's an inh but if, if, if some) live in. it's inhumane because it's an inh but if, if, if some of ve in. it's inhumane because it's an inh but if, if, if some of these >> but if, if, if some of these more local groups or charity groups maybe arguing that , groups were maybe arguing that, then be one thing i'm groups were maybe arguing that, then they be one thing i'm groups were maybe arguing that, then they do. be one thing i'm sure they do. >> lots of them do argue that. >> lots of them do argue that. >> the idea that >> but yeah, but the idea that these kept these people are being kept in horrible there horrible conditions there themselves just sorry, but themselves are just sorry, but i just think true. and just don't think it's true. and i we've just managed to i think we've just managed to prove that some this prove that with some of this footage tonight. but anyway, right, the rwanda right, coming up, the rwanda bill brand continues right, coming up, the rwanda bill the brand continues right, coming up, the rwanda bill the ofirand continues right, coming up, the rwanda bill the ofirand

bombshell cast review, should the former chief executive of the former chief executive of the lgbt charity stonewall, baroness hunt, lose her peerage ? baroness hunt, lose her peerage? >> so the controversial decision is do you let sarah take a take a puberty blocker? >> pre—puberty. a puberty blocker? >> pre—puberty . and the medical >> pre—puberty. and the medical view is yes, you do . so in fact, view is yes, you do. so in fact, it's pretty safe , hang on a it's pretty safe, hang on a minute. that's it's not true, no , “0, minute. that's it's not true, no , no, campaigner simon edge. jules, with the founder and ceo of see change happen, joanne lockwood. that's the debate. and it's

next. tomorrow's newspaper front page is up next in my press pack. but first, it is time for the head to head. okay, so, campaigners are calling for the former chief executive of lgbt charity stonewall to be stripped of her peerage following the bombshell release of the cass review. more than 12,000 people now signed a petition demanding baroness ruth hunt, of bethnal green is expelled from the house of lords for her, quote, deeply damaging conduct in promoting puberty blockers. the petition was launched on saturday and it says stonewall's irresponsible, deceitful and self—interested behaviour has caused untold havoc. we believe its chief executive at the time, ruth hunt, should take responsibility just as a little reminder for everybody. the cass review,

published last week concluded that vulnerable young children, confused gender, confused about their gender, were given harmful puberty blockers based weak evidence blockers based on weak evidence built on shaky foundations. but this is what baroness hunt said previously about giving kids puberty blockers . puberty blockers. >> what happens is they then go to secondary school and michael, who's been presenting as sarah for all of their primary schools, suddenly goes into secondary school and in secondary school and in secondary school and in secondary school it becomes much harder. so the controversial decision is do you let sarah take a take a puberty blocker ? take a take a puberty blocker? pre—puberty and the medical view is, yes, you do. so in fact, it's pretty safe . it's pretty safe. >> it's outrageous, though, isn't it, baroness hunt told the times newspaper over the weekend that she trusted the experts , that she trusted the experts, something she regretted. but what do you think? following the cass report, should the former chief exec of stonewall, baroness hunt, lose her peerage? gbnews.com/yoursay this is where you can go to have your say or tweet me @gbnews and while

you're there, vote in our poll. but first, to do battle on this, i'm joined now by author simon edge. i'm joined now by author simon edge . so the man who first edge. so the man who first launched this petition and founder and ceo of sea change, sorry , vie sea change happened, sorry, vie sea change happened, i should say charity. joanne lockwood, apologies , right. lockwood, apologies, right. okay, simon, i'll start with you. report, then , do you you. this report, then, do you actually seriously think now that baroness should lose that the baroness should lose her peerage? >> yeah, well, i launched this petition on saturday, and i was thinking of cast your mind back, patrick, to fred goodwin. >> do you remember fred goodwin, sir fred goodwin in the noughfies sir fred goodwin in the noughties , was the boss of the noughties, was the boss of the world's biggest bank, and he got a knighthood for it. and then the bank crashed rbs and it nearly tanked the economy and his knighthood was taken away. paula vennells earlier this yean the paula vennells earlier this year, the post office, year, who ran the post office, got the cbe and then it turned out that that she had been persecuting postmasters, knowing that they hadn't done anything. and her cbe was removed. both of

those people were given honours because of the job that they had been doing. ruth hunt was given a much bigger honour. she she is now at the age of 39. she was elevated to the house of lords, which makes her a legislator for life . and she got the job life. and she got the job entirely because she ran stonewall. she'd worked there for 14 years, barely had any other job. and now that we know, you know, that clip was brilliant that you played because what she was what she said at the oxford union in may 2019. puberty blockers are safe. we now know not to be true. the reverse was true. >> let's part that. that's part of because i'll come back of that because i'll come back to joanne. it to you, joanne. i mean, it wasn't just it wasn't just wasn't just true. it wasn't just untrue she said there. untrue what she said there. i mean, it was dangerous , right? mean, it was dangerous, right? and, you know, it's all very well and good saying, oh, i believed the experts. i mean, how did she look? you know, the cass the cass review spoke to the experts, looked it experts, looked at it, and it was pretty clear. i mean, some would not me, but some would would say not me, but some would say individual say that that individual actually serious say that that individual

actueto' serious say that that individual actueto answer serious say that that individual actueto answer . serious case to answer. >> i think you're looking at different cass review to the one i've seen. cass review i've seen. it's not saying these are dangers. they're saying that there's not they're not proven. i think we've been prescribing puberty blockers safely for many, many years. but why don't they release . they release. >> sorry, joanne. okay. this is well no no no sorry. and i will let you answer this. why don't they release then the evidence of happened the some of what's happened to the some 9000 people who went through the puberty blockers from a variety of different nhs trusts that they hide. i mean , they are trying to hide. i mean, you can't whitewash this cass review, surely? >> it's very , very easy to have >> it's very, very easy to have a biased perspective on this incident. many people read this review and they see many different stories that result on it . the cass review does not it. the cass review does not recommend that all trees of transgender young people and children ceases completely. what they recommend is more evidence needs to be gathered. more studies said it was safe place .

studies said it was safe place. >> say again, she said it was safe, they said the medical expert blockers, it was still being prescribed because puberty blockers are still being prescribed on licence to young children who have precocious puberty . puberty. >> that is not ceasing. what is ceasing is being used to them, using them as treatment for gender dysphoria or gender incongruence. but they're still being prescribed to young children today for precocious, precocious puberty. >> if they were dangerous, where was stonewall on that? >> let me finish. let me finish. if they were dangerous, why are they still being prescribed for certain cases for young children? no. >> that's okay. i'll just tell you that's a ridiculous thing to say, because what this is about was the fact that they were being out potentially like being given out potentially like candy you've candy in the wild west. you've said openly that. said they're openly said that. what's difference between a what's the difference between a child being child that they were being given? being given given? they were being given to people neurodiverse people with neurodiverse problems ? okay. that was not problems? okay. that was not being said. you diverse and being said. you a diverse and where simon where so. right. okay. look. stop it. all right.

simon where are you on this? i mean, this idea. now that this woman could still have a period surely is a bit ridiculous. well i mean, let's get back to. >> i mean, cass specifically said there is the evidence is weak for all of the treatments that are being handed out that are being given to young children distressed , distressed children distressed, distressed young people. and i think, you know, the point that this is not particularly a punishment for for, ruth hunt, it is more that the reward she was given is completely inappropriate, considering the havoc that she has caused. and for me, the killer thing was that there was a report in the times on saturday, which it wasn't a revelation. it was known already, but it gave a lot of attention to the fact that the a campaigning group called transgender trend. but put some materials into schools where there was a massive rise in particularly young girls presenting as saying that they

were they were trans, they were in the wrong body and transgender. in the wrong body and transgender . trend said that transgender. trend said that evidence is very weak that that puberty blockers and cross—sex hormones work , and there's very hormones work, and there's very weak little evidence about about the side effects. we don't we just don't know what they're what we're giving these people and for. and furthermore , that and for. and furthermore, that that if you socially transition kids , that's to say you treat kids, that's to say you treat them as the opposite sex. they will then go into medical pathways, which will be dangerous for them. this is exactly what cass has said. but but ruth hunt, at the head of stonewall, issued statements saying these materials should be shredded right . shredded right. >> and that's the point, right? and these these are the points, joanne , you're confronted by joanne, you're confronted by that. how on earth this that. how on earth can this person still remain in office and not not have any kind of apology? really dished out there? just to say i believe the isuppose there? just to say i believe the i suppose passing the buck, there absolute certainty there was absolute certainty in what saying people's what she was saying and people's lives ruined .

lives will have been ruined. >> well, even as we've just heard, there is still uncertainty. there's no categorical evidence that these these treatment paths are dangerous . there these treatment paths are dangerous. there is these treatment paths are dangerous . there is evidence dangerous. there is evidence that we need to look further . we that we need to look further. we need to set out these the guidelines, as per cass, to do proper studies, do tests, do do examine the evidence should have been done before was being given to kids. >> joanne. no. do you what should have been done? >> i i'm also, horrified that the nhs were not acting in a proper way. i think we all have concerns that these studies should have been in place , the should have been in place, the trial should have been carried out, and i was probably acting in good faith, believing that medical were doing medical professionals were doing this . now the cass this in good faith. now the cass reports come out calling out the question, let's push this forward as per the cass review, to do proper studies trials under license with medical supervision, support families, aid people who feel that gender transition wasn't right for them

through detransition pathways. let's do all of that. the recommendations and the pressure that stonewall put on employers, the pressure stonewall put the pressure that stonewall put on society . stonewall, on wider society. stonewall, like many advocacy charities and advocacy organisations, are giving a perspective to allow people gay, bi, trans , lesbian, people gay, bi, trans, lesbian, whatever they may be, to support them and create environments where they can work and live in peace. were they towards people who disagreed with them? >> joanne, were they all right? are they nice? they just accepted that, didn't they? they moved you could look at my >> well, you could look at my twitter feed. you can look at the that will be my the comments that will be on my twitter tonight. twitter feed after tonight. i don't get comments from don't get nice comments from people. me with people. people bombard me with hate. don't think hate. so no, i don't think trans people hateful than people are any more hateful than the side. we live in a the other side. we live in a world with politics world with divisive politics left versus we're always left versus right. we're always on not trying on the edges. we're not trying to centrist conversation. to have centrist conversation. we bring this into we need to bring this into the middle ground, sensible middle ground, have sensible conversations, not using bias or negative rhetoric. >> is trial i'm sorry. >> this is a trial i'm sorry. joanne, look, you seem lovely, but been sick all week but i have been sick all week of. and last week people , i'm

of. and last week people, i'm not including yourself in this, but people who did make this discussion incredibly toxic and cancel people and ruin people's lives . trying. trying to now lives. trying. trying to now lecture people, trying to now lecture people, trying to now lecture people, trying to now lecture people on how toxic the situation came and call for calm. they were not calling for calm. they were not calling for calm at the time. but look, both of you, thank you very, very much. will talk again. author much. we will talk again. author simon edge the man who simon edge there, the man who launched petition and launched this petition and the founder change founder and ceo of sea change happen charity, joanne lockwood. look, baroness look, we did approach baroness hunt and she failed hunt for comment and she failed to to us. what do to get back to us. so what do you think? baroness hunt you think? should baroness hunt lose peerage? 97% of you lose her peerage? 97% of you think that she should her think that she should lose her period. 3% of you say that she shouldn't. sunak shouldn't. coming up rishi sunak stabs predecessor firmly in stabs his predecessor firmly in the i stabs his predecessor firmly in thei did have the stomach to >> i did have the stomach to argue out loud about her economic policies. had the conviction to say that they were wrong . wrong. >> liz truss, a victim of the deep state. we've got information to share about the unelected agents having a huge amount of influence at the heart of government. plus, will someone address the elephant on

the streets of montana? are yes, there we go. but the house of lords, of course, as well, have blocked and delayed is rwanda bill. that's rishi sunak once again we cover this massive political alongside the political story alongside the very first of

welcome back to patrick christys tonight. and it is time to bring you the very first look at tomorrow's front pages. let's do it . here's the metro deluged in it. here's the metro deluged in dubal it. here's the metro deluged in dubai. thousands of british travellers have been stranded in dubal travellers have been stranded in dubai. there we go. okay, let's go to the i. israel will defy plea for restraint and strike iran. cameron reveals biden may seek to revive iran nuclear deal seek to revive iran nuclear deal, so yeah, this is the news that netanyahu has rebuffed david cameron's advice to show caution and will make his own decisions. let's go to the guardian . brexit blamed as uk guardian. brexit blamed as uk drug shortages put lives at

risk. drug shortages are the new normal, apparently in brexit britain . they also have that britain. they also have that story about benjamin netanyahu rejecting calls for restraint. we go to the daily mail now . we go to the daily mail now. tories trail labour on defence, tax, migration and even brexit. but exclusive poll for the mail finds 45% still don't want a starmer government. there's a picture story here as well of prince harry. goodbye britain, harry registers america as his official home. the sun american idol harry prince is officially a us resident now. he's cut all ties with britain. prince harry has officially registered himself as an american resident, apparently , he's listed the us apparently, he's listed the us as his new country in his records. there's also another story on the front of the sun here. not deported, free to rape an asylum seeker whose deportation was blocked by lawyers has admitted to raping a 15 year old girl. he's from the congo originally, and he wants

protested outside of the detention centre with a migrants are not criminals sign. so you know there we go . okay. yeah. know there we go. okay. yeah. all right. well, look , i've got all right. well, look, i've got my panel here as ever and joining me is the director of popular conservatives, mark littlewood, businessman and activist adam brooks, an author and journalist, rebecca reid. you know, i am actually going to focus in on that front page just quickly here, before we delve into deep state. so a failed into the deep state. so a failed asylum whose deportation asylum seeker whose deportation was when got cabin was blocked when due got a cabin crew, refused to fly him home, has pleaded guilty. you know, he's posing with a sign saying migrants are not criminals. this is shouldn't block is why people shouldn't block deportation it? >> n it? >> i mean, this is >> yeah. i mean, this is horrific. look i mean, might horrific. look i mean, you might say unlucky, but this is say it's unlucky, but this is proof, patrick, that the road to hell is paved with good intentions , isn't i mean, intentions, isn't it? i mean, what must people now be what must these people now be thinking ? james cleverly makes thinking? james cleverly makes a very good that, you know, very good point that, you know, they decide they suddenly decide to intervene, with with intervene, possibly with with

decent motives, i suppose. but the consequences here have been absolute bloody, absolutely dreadful. >> let's remember, we've got an incoming government, a labour government who many of their mps wrote a letter to stop deportation flights. now we are getting hundreds of these people coming over on dinghies and in lorries every day. we don't know their pasts or what their intentions are. you know , intentions are. you know, families, they're in your town. i just think we cannot carry on going on like this. >> people think they're doing the right thing, don't they? and they think, oh, done my they think, oh, i've done my bit. then, you know, i just bit. and then, you know, i just wonder they rebecca, wonder how they feel, rebecca, when stories like when they read stories like that. and there's a 15 year old when they read stories like that.youi there's a 15 year old when they read stories like that.you know,'s a 15 year old when they read stories like that.you know, whose year old when they read stories like that.you know, whose yearwill girl, you know, whose life will never same again now. never be the same again now. >> there's not a lot to be >> yeah, there's not a lot to be said like 15 year old said really? like a 15 year old girl raped. there is no girl got raped. there is no defence. no defence. there is no explanation. i think person explanation. i think this person should this should go to prison in this country, because think that he country, because i think that he will rape other people because he rapist, maintain he is a rapist, i maintain that opinion. he's dangerous opinion. i think he's dangerous wherever and he wherever he goes, and he probably should be locked up for the of his life.

the rest of his life. >> look, let's >> all right, look, let's let's move bit now, because move it on a bit now, because there's been rather of there's been rather a lot of talk about the deep state. all right? rishi sunak stuck the right? or rishi sunak stuck the knife pmqs knife into liz truss at pmqs earlier mr speaker, mr earlier today. mr speaker, mr speaken earlier today. mr speaker, mr speaker, when my predecessor was running for leader, to use his words, i did have the stomach to argue out loud about her economic policies, had the conviction to say that they were wrong . well, rishi sunak may wrong. well, rishi sunak may gloat, but many would argue that truss and kwartengs mini—budget never stood a chance against what some call the deep state. so for those of you unfamiliar with the terms, the group is described as an anonymous bunch of bureaucrats who wield much more influence than more power and influence than most realise. and mark most people realise. and mark littlewood joins us now. you believe that there is a cabal of unelected agents who hold a lot of behind the scenes, of power behind the scenes, don't you? >> do, patrick. now, >> yeah, i do, patrick. now, look, quite difficult to >> yeah, i do, patrick. now, look, get quite difficult to >> yeah, i do, patrick. now, look, get talkingifficult to >> yeah, i do, patrick. now, look, get talking about to >> yeah, i do, patrick. now, look, get talking about this even get talking about this without me putting my tinfoil hat on. right. because you sound a bit bananas, don't you? everybody thinks we live in a democracy. we elect a government. okay, maybe the

party its leader, but, party changes its leader, but, you know, the politicians decide what happens. i think unfortunately , we over the past unfortunately, we over the past quarter of a century or so, probably really started with blair a bit, a bit earlier than blair, conceivably major. perhaps we've allowed up perhaps we've allowed to grow up a whole network of quangos, quasi autonomous non—governmental organisations which are supposed to be independent and expert but actually are increasingly wielding more power than our elected politicians, now elected politicians screw up, they make bad decisions often, but they can be kicked out of office. but i'll give you some examples of the sort of groups that i mean , the sort of groups that i mean, the sort of groups that i mean, the independent bank england, the independent bank of england, the independent bank of england, the making it the whole idea was making it independent. it would suddenly mean that it was going to have a satisfactory monetary policy. they targets they miss their targets for inflation. after month inflation. month after month after month after month, and no head rolls . and it's damn near head rolls. and it's damn near impossible to get rid of the governor the bank of england, governor of the bank of england, never and difficult never elected and very difficult to depose. i guess. patrick, most of your viewers would not have heard a man called

have heard of a man called richard is the head richard hughes. he is the head of for budget of the office for budget responsibility . i hold him no responsibility. i hold him no personal animus, but his job is to tell the chancellor of the exchequer how much fiscal headroom he has. that's to say, how much can you cut tax by? or, you know, how much more spending can you do? essentially you've got richard hughes telling jeremy hunt, our chancellor how much pocket money he's got, or take natural england run by tony juniper, who's a former head, i believe, of friends of the earth, you know, it's job. it sounds rather nice to protect nature and the rest of it, by some estimates , tony juniper and some estimates, tony juniper and his outfit have stopped the building 150,000 homes. now, you may approve disapprove of may approve or disapprove of these policies, but i want these policies enacted by elected politicians, not by a network of 500 quangos who i think now probably have more power than the government itself. >> this is a genuine question. if you had that the same revolving door that we've had with politicians, have had

with politicians, have you had that every single office? that for every single office? wouldn't impossible wouldn't it be impossible to get anything ? anything done? >> no. you get things >> no. i mean, you get things done voting them through parliament. >> but surely one of the great things about the civil service, for instance, that you get for instance, is that you get a kind of continuity of care. so as change and things as governments change and things are up and there's a huge amount of there people of upheaval, there are people who kept who know where the paper is kept and what 1973. and what we did in 1973. >> favour of, you >> i'm all in favour of, you know, civil service being know, the civil service being functional knowing where the functional and knowing where the paper and the paper is kept and how the database system works, and what's process by which what's the process by which we get b , but i'm not in get a to b, but i'm not in favour of these people making policy decisions . and, you know, policy decisions. and, you know, the bank of england and the obr. i argue, are i would now argue, are as influential more influential if not more influential if not more influential than our chancellor of the exchequer. now, if you want to elect richard hughes, chancellor of the exchequer, be my guest. but in the absence of that, should not be that, jeremy hunt should not be hemmed that, jeremy hunt should not be heri'm d that, jeremy hunt should not be heri'm going bring out him in >> i'm going to bring out him in on because, you know, look, on this because, you know, look, you're you're the voter. you're the right? the you're the punter, right? and are heard the you're the punter, right? an half are heard the you're the punter, right? an half of are heard the you're the punter, right? an half of these are heard the you're the punter, right? anhalf of these people heard the you're the punter, right? anhalf of these people . heard the you're the punter, right? an half of these people . youird the you're the punter, right? anhalf of these people . you do of half of these people. you do you do elect people. you elect

them to try and get things through parliament. they get those parliament. through parliament. they get thosassume parliament. through parliament. they get thosassume thingsiament. through parliament. they get thosassume things are ent. you assume those things are going and it appears going to happen, and it appears as there's people behind going to happen, and it appears as scenesthere's people behind going to happen, and it appears as scenes blockingeople behind going to happen, and it appears as scenes blocking them.ehind the scenes blocking them. >> i'll even go back to >> again, i'll even go back to say, had the tony say, covid. we had the tony blair influence blair institute having influence over having over our covid policy and having meetings. that's a former meetings. so that's a former prime minister and his institute of paid lackeys telling our government what they should do , government what they should do, and the government listening people like michael gove lapping it up . now, you see that in it up. now, you see that in america with like obamas and the clintons , there are very, very clintons, there are very, very powerful above of our powerful people above of our prime minister and our elected officials that seem to be pulling strings. you've got billionaires like bill gates that fly in and advise our government why he's a computer salesman. that's made it big. why is people like bill gates influencing policy in our country? that is what i call the deep state and the cabal of the world. >> i'm just going to park that because i don't think i have time. but i will specifically say on this idea of a deep

state, i find one of the conservative values that i enjoy is rely on yourself, is that you rely on yourself, and your own problem, and you are your own problem, and you are your own problem, and unconservative and it's so unconservative of liz be like, i'd rather liz truss to be like, i'd rather than saying i did a bad job when i screwed up. she's going. it wasn't my fault. it was because of all these people couldn't of all these people i couldn't possibly made it. it's so possibly have made it. it's so weak if you were a good weak willed. if you were a good enough politician, would enough politician, you would have able make it. but have been able to make it. but this whining about nobody help have been able to make it. but this nobody about nobody help have been able to make it. but this nobody about rwin.1y help have been able to make it. but this nobody about rwin. it'selp childish. >> isn't on 3mm truss >> this isn't all on liz truss and. and if she were a better. there were nefarious, actors at play there were nefarious, actors at play who. >> well, i mean, well, i would say an example here in what say i'm an example here in what happened to and look , you happened to truss and look, you might disapprove of her policies or even believe that she didn't navigate the political landscape with deftness of touch. but with a deftness of touch. but just before the mini—budget, the bank of england only increased interest rates by a smidgen. they did not follow the us federal reserve bank that , i federal reserve bank that, i think, was a policy disaster, which led to the fall of the pound more than the mini—budget for which no heads have rolled.

mark, if you were if you were if you were prime minister, you would have just done exactly what you just did. >> you would have stood up and said people would have said that and people would have listened and listened and understood. and she is idiot. so did not is an idiot. so she did not stand and say that. and stand up and say that. and if you don't communicate, she's needing know, needing it. if you don't know, if don't communicate things if you don't communicate things to can't she to people, they can't know, she couldn't interest couldn't affect the interest rate. her, rate. that was stupid of her, but could people, you but she could tell people, you just you're not prime just did it. you're not prime minister. right? minister. all right? >> okay, okay. and, yeah, minister. all right? >don't okay, okay. and, yeah, minister. all right? >don't thinkiy, okay. and, yeah, minister. all right? >don't think it's kay. and, yeah, minister. all right? >don't think it's fair and, yeah, minister. all right? >don't think it's fair tord, yeah, minister. all right? >don't think it's fair to calleah, i don't think it's fair to call the prime minister of the former prime minister of this idiot, to this country an idiot, to be fair. anyway, unlike fair. but anyway, now, unlike dumbo, can use dumbo, not all elephants can use their fly out the their wings to fly out of the circus . this one escaped using circus. this one escaped using old fashioned methods. meet viola, from jordan. viola, who escaped from jordan. world circus in montana after being startled by a backfiring car while she was being washed by her handlers. after closing roads , startling locals and roads, startling locals and defaecating on a lawn just before she was caught, viola safely made it back to the circus by her handlers. a petrol station worker who spotted the big beast, said it's not every day you see an elephant walking down harrison avenue in butte,

montana, certainly not montana, so it's certainly not random individual random american individual coming up, scottish first minister humza yousaf is pushing for a new misogyny bill, which will protect men identifying as trans women. wait till you see what he's tweeted. all right. but that is when i crown today's greatest britain a union jack. plus, i can't work out who's worse. is it lycra louts, cyclists or e—scooter riders? can you guess what happens next? but before all that, sir keir starmer has promised to sack anyone caught briefing against his advisers and dismissed claims that a boys club is in charge of the labour party. more front pages coming your way very, very shortly

welcome back to patrick christys. tonight and i have got more front pages for you. let's do it . okay. it's the times do it. okay. it's the times hopes of rate cuts suffer. blow inflation falling more slowly than expected. the other headune than expected. the other headline there is tory mp demanded thousands of pounds from party aid. a conservative

mp is under investigation over allegations that he misused campaign funds. and we've got some synchronised swimmers as well. let's go to the daily telegraph. angela rayner faces new homes, tax questions dozen strong police team investigating labour deputy leader story at the bottom of the telegraph. here's scottish primary schools will have pupils as lgbt champions. why and anyone who tells you there's any kind of indoctrination taking place north of the border is obviously wrong. right. i'm joined again by my press pack. we've got the director of pop cons, mark littlewood, businessman activist adam author adam brooks, and author and journalist now journalist rebecca reid. now look, a group of leading doctors have called for paris to be banned smacking kids. have called for paris to be bannysay smacking kids. have called for paris to be bannysay it smacking kids. have called for paris to be bannysay it leads cking kids. have called for paris to be bannysay it leads to ng kids. have called for paris to be bannysay it leads to violence kids. they say it leads to violence and health issues . it's and mental health issues. it's already out of the question. in wales in scotland , marc, do wales and in scotland, marc, do you smoke? would you smack kids? yeah, i haven't got any kids, so it doesn't doesn't apply to me. >> i think this too >> i think this is too restrictive. there is clearly a proportionality thing here. you can't beat your kids with, you

know, a cat of nine tails or whatever. but i think to go so far to say , you know, a clip far as to say, you know, a clip on the side to say, you on the back side to say, you mustn't that, kids though, mustn't do that, kids though, presumably. yeah. mustn't do that, kids though, prescan'tly. yeah. mustn't do that, kids though, prescan't just yeah. mustn't do that, kids though, prescan't just you yeah. mustn't do that, kids though, prescan't just you can't yeah. mustn't do that, kids though, prescan't just you can't just h. mustn't do that, kids though, prescan't just you can't just go you can't just you can't just go out streets of london and out on the streets of london and do it for a laugh. yeah, but i think that sort of, you know, very moderate, discipline very moderate, modest discipline is , i think acceptable. is, i think is acceptable. i don't believe that's disproportionate. i don't disproportionate. and i don't believe that that causes mental scarring. was smacked a few scarring. i was smacked a few times as a kid by my parents. it probably did me a little bit of good, but that doesn't mean that you should thrashing them you should be thrashing them with a with a whip. >> no, violence against children is to say is a no no. but for me to say that never, you know, that i've never, you know, smacked my kid or tapped him on on backside would a lie . on the backside would be a lie. and i think, you know, probably 80% would, would, 80% of parents would, would, would have would agree with me and have done same. they might not done the same. they might not admit national television, admit it on national television, but be some sort admit it on national television, budiscipline be some sort admit it on national television, budiscipline at be some sort admit it on national television, budiscipline at home. some sort admit it on national television, budiscipline at home. iome sort admit it on national television, budiscipline at home. i thinkort of discipline at home. i think we're seeing young generations grow up with without any discipline at home, and it's showing on streets and it's showing on the streets and it's showing on the streets and it's showing in schools. they've lost respect. i was

respect. i grew up, i was terrified of the police walking around. you know, i was terrified at upsetting an adult. now you've got kids running around calling adults and the police names. there has to be discipline at home. and i think, you know, a little smack on the backside. not violent is proportionate. okay? >> proportionate . >> proportionate. >> proportionate. >> but, the issue, i think, is that it makes it harder for the social services to intervene because you have to that because you have to prove that it wasn't proportionate force. different , social different children, social services. very, very services. it's very, very difficult are issues difficult when there are issues of vehemently of child abuse. i am vehemently anti—smacking because every expert, single child expert, every single child psychologist agrees that a it doesn't really work, it just makes them afraid and angry and b doesn't. it's not fair on b it doesn't. it's not fair on them. and also, i used to them. and also, yeah, i used to run sex magazine and i run a sex magazine and i interviewed hundreds and hundreds men who all had hundreds of men who all had fetishes being and fetishes for being beaten and all of them were hit as children. all of that children. and all of that started childhood. and started in childhood. and i don't run risk. don't want to run the risk. there also sorry, i used to there are also sorry, i used to run sex magazine. run a sex magazine. >> just for there are, >> okay, just for the there are, i think is lived evidence i think there is lived evidence though, there that being though, is there not that being smacked proportionally as

smacked a bit proportionally as a not already do any a child does not already do any harm, i do think i do think most people, especially , you know, of people, especially, you know, of a certain age. >> would you say that most people are all right? but there are lots of people used to argue that about hitting wife or that about hitting your wife or your girlfriend. >> know, it >> you know, why is it different? why i hit my different? why? why can i hit my daughter? my boyfriend can't hit me. different? daughter? my boyfriend can't hit me oh, different? daughter? my boyfriend can't hit me oh, please. different? >> oh, please. that is ridiculous. >> fm- >> because you're in loco parentis your daughter. parentis to your daughter. you're loco parentis to you're not in loco parentis to your boyfriend. >> what? wife >> do you know what? my wife could and could hit me in the face and i would even raise a hand would never even raise a hand back that's good. right back to her. that's good. right are the same. but that is. there is nothing that with is nothing to link that with smacking your year old boy on smacking your 14 year old boy on the he's he's the backside because he's he's just £20 out your just nicked £20 out of your wallet something oh wallet or something then. oh come on. >> surely you >> but surely you want to address the why that's address the cause of why that's happening, not hit them. happening, not just hit them. >> might not the >> yeah, it might not be the only discipline, but only part of discipline, but it's a bit like saying if you kick your cat off sofa, it's kick your cat off the sofa, it's animal kick your cat off the sofa, it's aniiyou shouldn't cats, >> you also shouldn't kick cats, you push your cat. you know, you push your cat. >> so i don't think you should hit anyone household at all. >> ever. okay, okay, fine. now look, this is the look, look, look, this is the shocking an shocking moment that an e—scooter into a 67 year

e—scooter ploughs into a 67 year old grandmother, knocking her to the ground in northamptonshire this the are this month. the police are investigating that investigating the collision that left smith with left shirley smith with persistent back pain, severe bruising her body and bruising all over her body and to worse, the to make matters worse, the female e—scooter rider reportedly shirley for reportedly blamed shirley for the incident before speeding off. i don't know if we can play that, can we just go on? was it was through again? let's see. was it through again? let's see. shirley, poor i think shirley, poor shirley, i think as stands, i'm team as it stands, i'm on team shirley. me too. i think we're all on team shirley. whoa. there you go. there shouldn't be on the pavement, should they? >> i there shouldn't be. >> i think there shouldn't be. >> i think there shouldn't be. >> anyway. it's illegal to drive on. be wrong. on. i might be wrong. is it illegal on the illegal to drive on the pavement? it is. pavement? i think it is. >> is illegal. i think >> it is illegal. i think they're i they're technically illegal. i think of them in think sadiq said none of them in london. stop. and everyone went. >> no, what sadiq now? >> no, but what is sadiq now? >> no, but what is sadiq now? >> right. okay. yeah. okay. >> all right. okay. yeah. okay. so right. going have to so right. we're going to have to be quick with this be really quick with this greatest britain union jack ass time. my great britain, time. rapido, my great britain, liz truss really shown guts liz truss really shown some guts to out with a book. expose to come out with a book. expose the deep state lover all over. you can't ignore her, thank god that she's actually can. still

contributing to the debate. hasn't just run off to the hills. former prime minister liz truss mine is lucy frazer for truss mine is mp lucy frazer for calling the of trans calling for the ban of trans women in women's sport. >> finally, we are getting somewhere and people are not scared speak scared to speak out. >> all right, rebecca and the royal college of paediatrics and child for the child health, who call for the ban smacking. child health, who call for the ban think acking. child health, who call for the ban thinkacking. children is >> i think smacking children is fundamentally strong >> okay. all right. strong choices have gone for choices as ever. i have gone for lucy frazer mp , so that's lucy frazer mp, so that's today's greatest britain, so there we go . right. union there we go. right. union jackass time. mark. >> well, this is honouree. young brazilian woman called erika de souza vieira . nunes, she went souza vieira. nunes, she went into the bank with her elderly uncle in a wheelchair and tried to get her elderly uncle to sign a loan form so she could get . a loan form so she could get. we've got it. >> we've got the video. >> we've got the video. >> it's absolutely unbelievable. the staff at the bank said that her uncle was looking rather pale, and that was because he was dead , she he's dead. he's was dead, she he's dead. he's literally dead. >> you're joking . >> you're joking. >> you're joking. >> and so she was attempting to sign a loan in his name, and he

is dead. >> she tried. well, she she tried to put the pen in his hand at one point and said, wake up, uncle, sign it here. >> absolutely unbelievable. but proof that most criminals are actually right, very quickly. >> is wi- wi— >> mine is humza yousaf or useless , for the scottish useless, for the new scottish misogyny covers men misogyny bill, which covers men identifying as women. yeah, okay, go on then. >> mine's katharine birbalsingh more teaching, fewer headlines , please. >> oh. all right, well, look, today's, union jackass is erika de souza. vieira. nunes for literally wheeling a dead man in and trying to make him sign a document so she could get a loan. and to be honest with you, it doesn't get it doesn't get much worse than that. right? look. thank you. thank you, thank you to thank you, thank you to everybody watching everybody who's been watching or listening at home. ben leo will be with tomorrow 9 pm. be with you tomorrow at 9 pm. i'm see you in a bit. i'm off. see you in a bit. >> a brighter outlook with boxt solar , sponsors of weather on . solar, sponsors of weather on. gb news. >> time for your latest weather

update from the met office here on gb news. good evening. temperatures dropping away tonight. it's going to be a cold start tomorrow. much of the south will stay fine, but further north some rain and cloud moving in. thanks this cloud moving in. thanks to this little of pressure little area of low pressure that's drifting south of that's drifting south ahead of that, we've a couple of that, we've had a couple of weather fronts bringing some rain for rain today, particularly for northern that's now northern ireland that's now spreading parts of spreading south across parts of pembrokeshire, and pembrokeshire, devon and cornwall. clearing through cornwall. but clearing through this showers this evening further showers across eastern england. they'll steadily fade well. and where steadily fade as well. and where we've got the clear skies, southern scotland, northwest england and wales a hint of blue on the chart, suggesting there will a frost. certainly will be a frost. certainly in the countryside, most and the countryside, most towns and cities staying above cities just about staying above freezing, certainly a chilly freezing, but certainly a chilly start for many. start to thursday for many. a bright sunny start. there could be some showers early on across kent. they should fade, but rain will creep into for the highlands of scotland, the western isles first thing and that will spread across most of scotland lunchtime. parts of scotland by lunchtime. parts of the and east of northern the north and east of northern ireland some and ireland seeing some rain and through afternoon, through the afternoon, turning damp and damp over northern england and north of the

north wales. but much of the south will stay dry and bright. we could reach 15 in london. a brighter anglia, brighter day across east anglia, cooler further the cooler further north, with the winds up and those brisk winds picking up and those brisk winds picking up and those brisk winds then feature the winds then a feature of the weather on friday as well. friday. broadly speaking, a mixture sunshine showers , mixture of sunshine and showers, a duller day across the southeast and a much wetter day across east anglia compared to tomorrow. feeling chilly again with that wind? much of northern ireland having drier ireland scotland having a drier day but still on the fresh side. 8 to 14 degrees. >> that warm feeling inside from boxt boilers, sponsors of weather on

gb news. >> good evening. it's 11:00. >> good evening. it's11:00. you're with gb news in a moment. headliners. but first, let's bnng headliners. but first, let's bring you up to date with the latest news headlines and the government's flagship illegal migration . the rwanda migration policy. the rwanda bill another major setback. bill had another major setback. suffering another defeat in the house of lords this evening. peers have maintained pressure on the government over the pm's deportation plan, with continual demands for reassurances in the form of amendments. the house of lords ignored ministerial calls to back down and again tonight insisted on further revisions to the safety of rwanda bill. the home secretary , james cleverly, home secretary, james cleverly, in response, said afterwards we want to break up the criminal people smuggling gangs and stop the boats. labour uncomfortable with tackling immigration, will clearly stop at nothing to stop

the planes. in other news, today , the uk has signed an agreement with vietnam to increase cooperation on tackling illegal migration. it comes as vietnam's nationals overtake others as the predominant nationality on small boat crossings. vietnamese nationals made up 5% of small boat arrivals last year across the english channel. that's up from 1% in 2022, according to home office figures. the boss of the post office was exonerated today following an independent investigation into allegations of bullying. nick read always rejected claims of misconduct. the firm says he has its full backing now to lead the organisation , which continues to organisation, which continues to fall under the spotlight over the horizon . it scandal, during the horizon. it scandal, during which hundreds of subpostmasters were wrongly convicted of theft and fraud . a 28 year old man and fraud. a 28 year old man convicted of attempting to murder two elderly worshippers in mosques in what a judge

described as horrific attacks, has been sentenced to an indefinite hospital order. mohammed abshir, who was a paranoid schizophrenic through petrol over his victims and then set them on fire outside mosques in birmingham and in london, the court heard 82 year old hashi odowa and 70 year old mohammed riaz were chosen at random because abshir believed they were possessed by evil spirits as well. one of the victim's sons, mohammed riaz jnr, said his father's attacker should have been sent to prison to face the maximum sentence. >> mohammed abacha, who set my father on fire. he's not going to serve a prison sentence, but he's going to be going to a hospital, probably get served a three course meal and have an evening cup of tea, whereas as he should be in a prison, you know, facing you know, maximum, maximum punishment, especially setting two people on fire in two main cities of the united

kingdom. you're talking

tv

Join Patrick for two hours of spirited debate and news making interviews. Top guests tackle the issues that matter, with a sharp take on every story.

TOPIC FREQUENCY

Patrick 31, Rwanda 30, Labour 21, House Of Lords 18, Uk 17, Britain 13, Scotland 12, England 11, Rishi Sunak 10, Wales 10, London 10, Parliament 10, East Anglia 10, Joe 9, Northern Ireland 8, James Cleverly 8, Mark 8, Home Office 8, Joanne 8, Lee 8

Notes

This material may be protected by copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code).

info Stream Only